User talk:62.253.232.138

January 2013
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Fiddler on the Roof was changed by 62.253.232.138 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.894905 on 2013-01-10T14:54:43+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:54, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Fiddler on the Roof with this edit, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Cst17 (talk) 14:58, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. Your further vandalism at the article Fiddler on the Roof has been reverted. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. -- Ssilvers (talk) 05:19, 11 January 2013 (UTC)

March 2013
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: George Bennet (missionary) was changed by 62.253.232.138 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.982075 on 2013-03-28T14:03:51+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:03, 28 March 2013 (UTC)

May 2013
Hello, I'm Pinethicket. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Acorn because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Pinethicket (talk) 14:27, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Millipede. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Pinethicket (talk) 14:28, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Linocut, you may be blocked from editing.  Pr at yya  (Hello!) 14:29, 9 May 2013 (UTC) This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Pearl necklace (sexuality), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Pinethicket (talk) 14:30, 9 May 2013 (UTC)


 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. -- Ed (Edgar181) 15:06, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Theatre of ancient Greece. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Dawn Bard (talk) 10:11, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

June 2013
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to Tā moko has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Tā moko was changed by 62.253.232.138 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.92318 on 2013-06-04T09:41:39+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 09:41, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Tā moko with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 09:45, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Tā moko with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Jim1138 (talk) 09:52, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

June 2013
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to Potassium has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Potassium was changed by 62.253.232.138 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.962665 on 2013-06-17T14:17:21+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:17, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Time series, you may be blocked from editing. Pinethicket (talk) 14:19, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Time series, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. 930913(Congratulate) 14:21, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Hut 8.5 14:24, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Dan Evans (tennis), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Widr (talk) 07:52, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. gadfium 08:40, 24 June 2013 (UTC)

July 2013
Hello, I'm MelbourneStar. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Dan Evans (tennis) because it did not appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. — Mel bourne Star ☆ talk 12:21, 3 July 2013 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Dan Evans (tennis). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. — Mel bourne Star ☆ talk 12:27, 3 July 2013 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I'm DDreth. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Bob Geldof because it did not appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! DD reth  ask me questions!   12:31, 3 July 2013 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Mo Farah with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. — Mel bourne Star ☆ talk 12:33, 3 July 2013 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. gadfium 20:46, 3 July 2013 (UTC)

September 2013
Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Minimalism, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Thomas.W  talk to me  09:10, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Lili Boulanger. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Jeffrd10 (talk) 14:28, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Lili Boulanger, you may be blocked from editing. Thomas.W  talk to me  14:47, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for abuse of editing privileges. If you have a registered Wikipedia username, you may log in and continue to edit. Otherwise, once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. &mdash;Darkwind (talk) 12:34, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

October 2013
Hello, I'm Liz. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Diet because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Liz Read! Talk! 14:01, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 months for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. gadfium 20:06, 22 October 2013 (UTC)

January 2014
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to Life expectancy has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Life expectancy was changed by 62.253.232.138 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.917194 on 2014-01-30T10:35:41+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 10:35, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Life expectancy with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 10:37, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 6 months for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. gadfium 19:56, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

On behalf of Aylesbury Grammar School, I'd like to say that we're really sorry. 62.253.232.138 (talk) 08:40, 7 July 2014 (UTC)

September 2014
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Operating system has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Operating system was changed by 62.253.232.138 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.886413 on 2014-09-04T12:31:36+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 12:31, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at A* search algorithm. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: A* search algorithm was changed by 62.253.232.138 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.964036 on 2014-09-04T12:36:32+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 12:36, 4 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Hi! What do you need help with? Philg88 ♦talk 13:34, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Operating system, you may be blocked from editing. Thomas.W talk 12:40, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at A* search algorithm. Thomas.W talk 12:41, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

Dear Thomas.W; Why have we been stopped from making our own notice that we've been banned? It wasn't posted by HJ Mitchell, so is that fair? :\ -Aylesbury Grammar School
 * You weren't banned, you were blocked, and deservedly so. The block notice is second from the top on this page. Thomas.W talk 13:34, 9 September 2014 (UTC)

October 2015
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Wendover Woods has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 11:18, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Wendover Woods was changed by 62.253.232.138 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.986822 on 2015-10-06T11:18:35+00:00.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Wendover Woods. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Denisarona (talk) 11:27, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Wendover Woods with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 11:30, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Wendover Woods. Denisarona (talk) 11:33, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 year for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice:. gadfium 20:06, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

October 2016
Hello, I'm PrimeHunter. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to 2016 Nobel Peace Prize have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. PrimeHunter (talk) 11:40, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2016
Hello, I'm CAPTAIN RAJU. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Long Crendon have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. CAPTAIN RAJU ( ✉ ) 11:14, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Aylesbury Grammar School. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. My Chemistry romantic (talk) 12:58, 18 November 2016 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 years for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. gadfium 20:43, 18 November 2016 (UTC)

November 2018
Hello, I'm ChasedSpade. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to War communism have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. ChasedSpade (talk) 16:57, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

December 2021
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Mary Prince—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 09:43, 9 December 2021 (UTC)