User talk:62.253.96.5

I am pinging you here as your talk page is watched by Pakistani editors. Your previous accounts were blocked indefinitely as you didn't know all the rules about Wikipedia. I have prepared my own list. You have enough time till October. Till then read these pages and links. Please don't reply here, just read and remember.

WP:STEWARDSHIP

WP:OWNBEHAVIOR

WP:TALKDONTREVERT

WP:FORUMSHOP

WP:CCC

WP:DISRUPTSIGNS

WP:FRINGE

WP:HUSH

WP:AOHA

WP:CITESPAM

WP:BOOKSPAM

WP:EMERGENCY

WP:BIASED

WP:SELFSOURCE

WP:NEWSBLOG

WP:NOTRS

WP:BLOGS

WP:ABOUTSELF

WP:REFLOOP

WP:PAYWALL

WP:ONUS

WP:REDFLAG

WP:RENAME

WP:APPNOTE

WP:SIGFORGE

WP:YESPOV - Indicate the relative prominence of opposing views. Ensure that the reporting of different views on a subject adequately reflects the relative levels of support for those views, and that it does not give a false impression of parity, or give undue weight to a particular view. For example, to state that "According to Simon Wiesenthal, the Holocaust was a program of extermination of the Jewish people in Germany, but David Irving disputes this analysis" would be to give apparent parity between the supermajority view and a tiny minority view by assigning each to a single activist in the field.

WP:THQ

WP:UNDUE

WP:BALASPS

WP:FALSEBALANCE

Neutral point of view

WP:ATTRIBUTEPOV

WP:STEALTH- (Pakistanis often do Stealth canvassing. But it's difficult to prove. You should have email connection with users whom you trust.

WP:SPINOFF - If a statement is inadmissible for content policy reasons at an article XYZ, then it is also inadmissible at a spinoff Criticism of XYZ. Spinoffs are intended to improve readability and navigation, not to evade Wikipedia's content policies.

WP:OUTING -, same goes for WP:ATTACK and WP:NLT

WP:SPA

What Wikipedia is not

WP:DISRUPTPOINT

Manual of Style/Words to watch

WP:EDITWAR and WP:3RR. even if your opponent is a WP:TAGTEAM

WP:BOOMERANG

Non-Pakistani editors who support Pakistani POV pushers - Drmies, Vanamonde93 and GB fan

WP:BITE

WP:CHERRY

WP:TPG

Disruptive editing

Notability

Arguments to avoid in edit wars

Miscellany for deletion

Image use policy

WP:CRUSH

WP:TENDENTIOUS

These two tools are good in finding evidence for socking. But this is first step. After that you have to check the edits.

1- https://tools.wmflabs.org/sigma/editorinteract.py

2- https://tools.wmflabs.org/intersect-contribs/

Adding these links

WP:BAIT

WP:COOL

WP:PRIMARY

WP:NOTRS

Arbitration/Guide to arbitration

WP:OFFER- Banned users seeking a return are well-advised to make significant and useful contributions to other WMF projects prior to requesting a return to English Wikipedia per this 'offer'. Many unban requests have been declined due to the banned user simply waiting the six months out, without making any contributions to other projects. Other WMF projects are https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Main_Page and  https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main_Page

After Mar4d got blocked in English Wikipedia, he is very active in Simple English Wikipedia.

https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Mar4d

Nomination of Urban agglomeration for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Urban agglomeration is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Urban agglomeration until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Batternut (talk) 15:08, 21 January 2018 (UTC)