User talk:62.255.32.14

Attention: This IP address, , is registered to NTL (brhm-cache-6.server.ntli.net) and is shared by multiple users. Comments left on this page may be received by other users of this IP and appear to be irrelevant. Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking. In the event of vandalism from this address, efforts will be made to contact NTL (brhm-cache-6.server.ntli.net) to report abuse.

If you are an unregistered user operating from this address, note that this need not necessarily be the IP address of your machine. In many cases, it turns out to be the IP address of a proxy server that communicates between your browser and the Wikimedia servers. Such proxies are shared among a huge number of users compared to the number of persons using your particular machine. If you are frustrated by irrelevant comments appearing here, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself. However, you will still be unable to edit Wikipedia while the IP you are using is blocked.

Note
This IP address represents the back-end of one of NTL's interception proxy HTTP servers, and so is shared by all NTL customers within a given region. See the note about anonymous users at the end of the article.

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. K1Bond007 17:03, May 18, 2005 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Hadal 03:43, 26 May 2005 (UTC)

Wikipedia is telling me that I have new messages and that this is one of them. However I haven't been vandalising pages and haven't even edited any as far as I can remember. I don't think 62.255.32.14 is even my IP address. Is this just Wikipedia being weird or what?

AfD nomination of Dempsey and Rowe
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Dempsey and Rowe. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Articles for deletion/Dempsey and Rowe. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:03, 6 February 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Propositional representation


The article Propositional representation has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern: Propositional representation – news, books, scholar Consequently, this article is about a subject that appears to lack sufficient notability.'''
 * '''A search for references failed to find significant coverage in reliable sources to comply with notability requirements. This included web searches for news coverage, books, and journals, which can be seen from the following links:

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Guy Macon 03:41, 21 February 2011 (UTC)