User talk:62.30.3.87

January 2022
Hello, I'm Editorofthewiki. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Derek Tidball have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. ~ EDDY  ( talk / contribs )~ 02:05, 8 January 2022 (UTC)


 * Hmmm, well first off, I was extraordinarily close to Derek and family during my time as a student. Sadly, for me and many other young men, Derek groomed us. He spanked me once in his study and used to take me on weekends away. So what I say is factually accurate.
 * I am currently gathering evidence for formal prosecution. I look forward to seeing Wikipedia tell the truth about Derek in the future.
 * Sad that you think my edit was vandalism when in fact it was totally accurate. The truth will win. 62.30.3.87 (talk) 22:38, 2 January 2023 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory content into an article or any other Wikipedia page again, as you did at Derek Tidball, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. BusterD (talk) 00:32, 13 January 2022 (UTC)

November 2022
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Derek Tidball, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Johand 199 (Talk)  18:15, 16 November 2022 (UTC)