User talk:62.57.166.73

January 2019
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Human evolution, you may be blocked from editing.  Acroterion   (talk)   19:44, 20 January 2019 (UTC)

EXPLAIN
Please explain why is it wrong to quote the empirical TRUTH:

The imperative, "led to" is biased since there's not enough scientific evidence to prove the LAW of evolution, neither to deny it with "did not lead to" with religious / creationist criteria.

That's why I choose to explain the worldwide acceptance of this THEORY rather than teaching people evolution with the same veracity as the first law of thermodynamics or Newton's law of universal gravitation.

January 2019
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring, as done at Human evolution. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. –&#8239;Joe (talk) 20:44, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.