User talk:62.6.255.250

January 2016
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to The Downs School, Compton has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:11, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: The Downs School, Compton was changed by 62.6.255.250 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.942275 on 2016-01-07T15:11:24+00:00.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Smart material. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Caballero / / Historiador   ☊  13:10, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Recent edit to White-tailed eagle
Hello, and thank you for your recent contribution. I appreciate the effort you made for our project, but unfortunately I had to undo your edit because I believe the article was better before you made that change. Feel free to contact me directly if you have any questions. Thank you! Dcirovic (talk) 10:52, 9 March 2016 (UTC)

April 2016
Hello. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Siegfried Sassoon— because it did not appear to be constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. &#160; Discant  X  09:40, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Siegfried Sassoon. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 09:43, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Siegfried Sassoon was changed by 62.6.255.250 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.913847 on 2016-04-28T09:43:36+00:00.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Siegfried Sassoon, you may be blocked from editing. Materialscientist (talk) 09:50, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2016
Hello, I'm MelbourneStar. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Curridge— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. —MelbourneStar ☆ talk 13:53, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Lulworth Cove. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. TerraCodes (talk to me) 09:02, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Monologue, you may be blocked from editing.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   11:05, 21 September 2016 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Monologue. TYelliot &#124;  Talk  &#124;  Contribs  09:59, 22 September 2016 (UTC)

March 2017
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Thorny dragon, you may be blocked from editing. TwoTwoHello (talk) 09:06, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

April 2018
Hello, I'm Vermont. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Inland taipan— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks.  Vermont &#124; reply here  09:44, 19 April 2018 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Inland taipan. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.  Vermont &#124; reply here  09:47, 19 April 2018 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Inland taipan. KylieTastic (talk) 12:17, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.