User talk:63.131.213.133

January 2018
Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Hopkinsville, Kentucky. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Magnolia677 (talk) 23:24, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2018
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Charleston, West Virginia. Magnolia677 (talk) 18:11, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Paducah, Kentucky. John from Idegon (talk) 03:00, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2018
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Graham 87 14:38, 26 March 2018 (UTC)

April 2019
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Kentucky. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. —BarrelProof (talk) 02:29, 8 April 2019 (UTC)


 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Edits to Kentucky
I see you've been making many edits to Kentucky articles, and nearly every one has been reverted. This is a waste of everyone's time, including yours. You need to know that when you change a population number--even if it is correct--it will likely be reverted if the source you are citing isn't entered correctly. Most experienced editors haven't the time to double-check your data, so they will just revert your edit to a previous version that was sourced properly. This means that when you update a population estimate, you can't just change the source from "2016" to "2018"; you have to re-enter the source cited so it is accurate. Please take a moment to read Help:Referencing for beginners, or feel free to ask for help. Thanks. Magnolia677 (talk) 09:33, 12 July 2019 (UTC)

July 2019
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Richmond, Kentucky, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 15:08, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Recent edit to Richmond, Kentucky
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Richmond, Kentucky, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! &#8213; Susmuffin Talk 21:16, 4 August 2019 (UTC)

August 2019
Hello, I'm CLCStudent. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Ashland, Kentucky have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. CLCStudent (talk) 23:50, 5 August 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Richmond, Kentucky. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Asdklf&#59; (talk) 03:31, 6 August 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Recent edit to Paducah, Kentucky
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Paducah, Kentucky, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Asdklf&#59; (talk) 04:17, 6 August 2019 (UTC)

October 2019
Hello, I'm CLCStudent. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Indiana have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. CLCStudent (talk) 16:18, 6 October 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2020
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Graham 87 15:57, 10 January 2020 (UTC)