User talk:63.149.216.90

February 2013
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Caravaggio was changed by 63.149.216.90 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.963248 on 2013-02-12T22:32:23+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 22:32, 12 February 2013 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Yakima, Washington. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place " " on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Yakima, Washington was changed by 63.149.216.90 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.917168 on 2013-02-12T23:00:53+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 23:01, 12 February 2013 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia  as a result of your . You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our policies concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated. Bearian (talk) 00:02, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

December 2013
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Infectious mononucleosis. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators can block users from editing if they repeatedly vandalize. Thank you. Pinethicket (talk) 17:36, 18 December 2013 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Infectious mononucleosis, you may be blocked from editing. Pinethicket (talk) 17:53, 19 December 2013 (UTC)

September 2015
Please stop your disruptive editing. Your edits have been reverted or removed. Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. -- Callinus (talk) 03:51, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2016
Hello, I'm Chesnaught555. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Softball— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Ches (talk) 18:52, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

June 2016
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Carl Friedrich Gauss. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Favonian (talk) 17:04, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Carl Friedrich Gauss. Favonian (talk) 17:48, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

September 2016
Hello, I'm Dcirovic. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Dinger— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Dcirovic (talk) 16:31, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

November 2017
Hello, I'm BilCat. An edit that you recently made to American football seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! BilCat (talk) 16:41, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I'm -glove-. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Chavín culture— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. -glove- (talk) 18:13, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

October 2019
Hello, I'm CLCStudent. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Steven Avery have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. CLCStudent (talk) 16:42, 25 October 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2021
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Artificial hair integrations. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Why did you think this addition improved this article?  Julietdeltalima   (talk)  19:25, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Artificial hair integrations, you may be blocked from editing. Materialscientist (talk) 19:53, 13 January 2021 (UTC)