User talk:63.164.145.85/Archive 1

2by4
I am enjoying your articles on Jimmy Smallhorne and related topics. I wondered if you could provide more information regarding the film 2by4, so that it could be placed into the correct category in Category:Films by genre. This would be greatly appreciated! Agentsoo 20:52, 2 August 2005 (UTC)

Category:Films by genre

General stuff
This IP is a Kinko's proxy.

Please read No personal attacks.

Do not edit other people's comments.

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Hadal 19:19, 12 Dec 2004 (UTC)

It is not necessary to post the entire article on that user's talk page. You can just post a link to the version in the article's history. Gamaliel 21:15, 14 May 2005 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may come back after the block expires. Gamaliel 19:55, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)

I DON'T UNDERSTAND--IF ONE CANNOT EDIT OTHER PEOPLE'S COMMENTS, THEN WHAT IS THE PURPOSE OF AN INTERACTIVE INTERNET ENCYCLOPEDIA????

ALSO--WHAT "PERSONAL" ATTACKS HAVE I MADE, AND TO/ON WHOM????

8/8/2005--I STILL HAVE NOT RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO MY QUERIES (ABOVE), AND ALSO, FOR THE RECORD HAVE NEVER YET BEEN BLOCKED AS GAMALIEL THREATENED.


 * The comments may not apply to you specifically, because you're an anonymous user on a Kinko's machine. To stop receiving these kinds of messages, please create an account. --Howcheng 15:36, 15 August 2005 (UTC)

Helen Gallagher
You keep adding a line about how she once pushed off another actor into the orchestra pit. Do you have any more details about this incident or some citation? I've left it in for now, but I'll probably remove it later if you can't back it up somehow. --Howcheng 15:47, 8 August 2005 (UTC)

Howcheng--I read about Helen Gallagher's action anecdotally while reviewing Merv Griffin's clippings file in the stacks at the New York Public Library for the Performing Arts at Lincoln Center. Griffin appeared in a musical with Gallagher and he had to physically restrain her from attacking him.

THANKS!! Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been removed. Please use Sandbox for any other tests you want to do, since testing in articles will be removed quickly. Please see the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. Jtkiefer T - 21:44, August 8, 2005 (UTC)

Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Hall Monitor 22:12, 9 August 2005 (UTC)

Tim Pat Coogan
Could you give a source for your controversial additions on this person? PatGallacher 17:41, 2005 August 14 (UTC)

His father's IRA background was acknowledged by Tim Pat himself, and the other controversail addition you are undoubtedly referring to is a matter of public knowledge in Ireland.

Where did this nonsense about Tim being gay come from? I'm gay myself and work in the media. If he was the rumour would have swept both media circles and the Irish gay scene years ago. (We have rumours about Catholic bishops, government ministers, rock stars, journalists, you name it but not one iota of a hint of a rumour about Tim Pat. The break-up of his marriage was for reasons other than orientation.) FearÉIREANN\(caint) 17:59, 14 August 2005 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

How did I vandalize Tim Pat Coogan's page -- by printing TRUE things which are offensive to somebody in Ireland?? 63.164.145.85 19:15, 14 August 2005 (UTC)


 * By


 * 1) Writing unsourced lies about the man's personal life on his page.
 * 2) By adding in an unsourced POV rant in the article when the first lie was removed.
 * 3) By writing personal abuse on a user page when told to stop adding rubbish to the article. FearÉIREANN[[Image:Ireland coa.png|15px]]\(caint)  19:37, 14 August 2005 (UTC)

This account has been temporarily blocked for repeated vandalism of articles. The block is time limited and will expire shortly.

Wikipedia apologies to those many genuine users who use this IP and who now find themselves blocked. It was a necessary short term act to stop an individual from constantly vandalising this site.

Further vandalism of this site using this IP number may lead to further blocks being imposed.

George Felix Allen
I must say that i take umbrage to the comment concerning that Senator Allen is extremely conservative. He's just a normal politician and that reeks of an NPOV violation. --StevenL 19:50, 15 August 2005 (UTC)

Michael Moore
Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks.&mdash;chris.lawson (talk) 13:48, 16 August 2005 (UTC)

Removing redlinks
Please do not remove every redlink you see. They are desirable on Wikipedia to some extent in that they alert editors of articles that need to be created. Thanks. Badagnani 17:39, 3 September 2005 (UTC)

OK-SORRY!! 63.164.145.85 17:41, 3 September 2005 (UTC)

Dates
Stop imposing US date conventions on non-US articles! Adam 03:20, 4 September 2005 (UTC)


 * What Adam said! IP4240207xx 10:59, 22 September 2005 (UTC)

How to edit BIOGRAPHIES
The objective of this Manual of Style (or style guide) is to provide guidelines for maintaining visual and textual consistency. Adherence to the following guidelines is not required; however, usage of these guidelines is recommended. By maintaining consistency, Wikipedia will be read, written, edited, navigated, and used easier by both readers and editors.

New contributors are reminded that clear, informative, and unbiased writing is more important than presentation and formatting. Writers are not expected or required to follow all or any of these rules: the joy of wiki editing is that perfection is not required.

See also: WikiProject Biography

Opening paragraph
The opening paragraph should give:
 * 1) Name(s) and title(s), if any (see Naming conventions (names and titles))
 * 2) Dates of birth and death, if known (see Manual of Style (dates and numbers))
 * 3) Nationality
 * 4) What they did
 * 5) Why they are significant

For example:
 * Cleopatra VII Philopator (December 70 BC/January 69 BC – c. August 12, 30 BC) was a queen of ancient Egypt. She was the last member of the Macedonian Ptolemaic dynasty to rule Egypt...
 * Francesco Petrarca or Petrarch (1304 – 1374) was an Italian scholar, poet, and humanist, who is credited with having given the Renaissance its name and inventing the concept of the Dark Ages...

Names
While the article title should be the name by which the subject is most commonly known, the subject's full name should be given in the lead paragraph, if known. Many cultures have a tradition of not using the full name of a person in everyday reference, but the article should start with the complete version. For example:
 * (from Fidel Castro): Fidel Castro Ruz (born August 13, 1926) ...
 * (from François Mitterrand: François Maurice Adrien Marie Mitterrand (October 26, 1916 – January 8, 1996) ...

In some cases, subjects have changed their names at some point after birth. In these cases the birth name should be given as well:
 * (from Bill Clinton): William Jefferson Clinton (born William Jefferson Blythe III on August 19, 1946) ...

Pseudonyms and common names
For people who are best known by a pseudonym, the birth name should usually appear first in the article, followed closely by the pseudonym. Follow this practice even if the article itself is titled with the pseudonym: Alternatively, the birth name can appear in apposition to the pseudonym:
 * Louis Bert Lindley, Jr. (June 29, 1929 – December 8, 1983), better known by the stage name Slim Pickens...
 * E. B. White (July 11, 1899 – October 1, 1985), born Elwyn Brooks White, was an American author, essayist, and noted prose stylist...

It is not always necessary to spell out why the article title and lead paragraph give a different name. In some cases of subjects using a familiar form of their name it may be so; however, care must be taken to avoid implying that a person who uses a familiar form of their name has therefore changed it. Therefore: "Johnny Reid "John" Edwards (born June 10, 1953) ..." is preferable to saying that John Edwards was born with the name Johnny Reid Edwards.

Honorific prefixes
The inclusion of some honorific prefixes and styles has proved controversial on Wikipedia. Wikipedia policy current distinguishes between two types of usage: The following are viewed by many (but not all) as acceptable:


 * Sir Elton John
 * Sri Caitanya Mahaprabhu; Sri Ramakrishna Paramhansa
 * St John the Apostle; St Francis of Assisi; St Stephen
 * The Reverend Al Sharpton; Reverend Sun Myung Moon
 * The Right Honourable Tony Blair
 * The Honorable John Ellis "Jeb" Bush
 * Tun Dr Mahathir bin Mohamad

Because of major controversies over their usage in pages on royalty and popes, as of August 2005 a new policy was agreed following a discussion.


 * Styles would not be used to open articles on royalty and popes. So the article on Pope Benedict XVI would no longer begin "His Holiness Pope Benedict XVI . . . " nor the article on Queen Victoria begin "Her Majesty Queen Victoria . . ."
 * Instead a special graphic known as an infobox, giving the official, spoken and alternative versions of a style for a member of a royal family or pope, would be included in the article.

See Naming conventions (names and titles) for their use in article titles.

Subsequent uses of names
After the initial mention of any name, the person may be referred to by surname only. For example:


 * Fred Smith was a cubist painter in the 15th century. He moved to Genoa, where he met John Doe. Smith later commented: "D'oh!"

The person may be referred to by their first name in the case of royalty, or as "Prince/ss John/Jane," or "The Duke," "The Earl," "The Duchess," "The Countess," etc. Similarly, if someone has been knighted they may be referred to as Sir Steve or Dame Judy. For other subjects, it is better to refer to the person by their surname and not their first name, even if the subject is not controversial, because it gives the impression that the writer knows the subject personally.

Nobility may be referred to by their title if that form of address would have been the normal way to refer to them, for example Robert Dudley, 1st Earl of Leicester may become "the Earl of Leicester" or just "Leicester" in subsequent mentions. Be careful not to give someone a title too soon, for example use "Robert Dudley" or "Dudley" until his elevation to the peerage in 1563.

To disambiguate between siblings, use the surname of the article header to indicate that person, and use first names or complete names to indicate siblings.

Australian article
Please stop making ignorant, pointless and illiterate edits to Australian biographical articles. This is the second time I have asked you to desist. If you do it again I will apply to have you blocked. Adam 10:58, 8 September 2005 (UTC)

Sockpuppet source:
Source: Using this IP address (63.164.145.85), This page: Votes_for_deletion/List_of_Roman_Catholics was modified as follows:


 * On 19:57, 24 July 2005:
 * "PLEASE DO NOT DELETE--I HAVE SPENT SO MUCH TIME AND MONEY (AT KINKO'S) TRYING TO KEEP THE LIST UPDATED. I HAVE DONE SO WITH METICULOUSNESS AND SINCE IT IS SOMETHING I KNOW A LOT ABOUT I HAVE ENJOYCED DOING IT. THE PROBLEM SEEMS TO BE THAT TOO MUCH INFO. IS PRESENT, NOT THAT IT IS INACCURATE OR INCOMPLETE OR ANYHTING LIKE THAT!! (rms125a@hotmail.com)"

+ Thanks for your attention!! + Robert Sieger (rms125a@hotmail.com)"
 * On 22:59, 24 July 2005:
 * "Addendum to previous message: I think that it would be best to simply place a moratorium on any new additions or edits to the "List of Roman Catholics", so that a division by category can be arranged. I did not realize that space would be such an issue for Wikipedia--as a near-computer illiterate, I thought cyberspace was unlimited, but I see there is a problem, so as of 12:01 A.M. (7/25/05), a MORATORIUM should be installed prohibiting any new additions, deletions, edits, etc., only permitting viewing.


 * On 00:11, 25 July 2005:
 * "Thank you "NoSeptember". R. Sieger (rms125a@hotmail.com)"

The style, and subjects, of 90% of the edits are consistant with User:Rms125a@hotmail.com, and the other IP addresses mentioned. The other IP's are also all from New York City. If you look at Mr. Sieger's edit style, then look at all of the IP's that ''were' listed on his page, the are identical 95% of the time. It is him. PERIOD. IP4240207xx
 * Please note that This anon IP was used by Rms125a@hotmail.com before he registered his account, something several users including myself encouraged him to do since he was making a large number of edits (primarily to biographies and biographical list pages). Please go directly to User talk:Rms125a@hotmail.com to communicate with him. NoSeptember  22:13, 8 September 2005 (UTC)

If you look at the "User contributions" for this IP, it is VERY apparent that Mr. Robert Sieger, Rms125a@hotmail.com, is still using this IP address, as well as these:

User:67.100.109.48 User:67.100.52.10 User:70.19.74.24 User:70.19.47.217 User:70.19.63.169 User:70.19.91.64 User:67.100.55.13 User:70.18.207.16

207.69.138.137 02:54, 9 September 2005 (UTC)

George Galloway
Please do not keep undoing other people's edits without discussing them first. This is considered impolite and unproductive. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia under the three-revert rule, which states that nobody may revert an article to a previous version more than three times in 24 hours. Thank you. Hall Monitor 19:48, 28 September 2005 (UTC)

dates
Stop changing non-US topics to follow US dating style of mm/dd/yy. Wikipedia follows the same rules with dates as with American English vs British English. Use the form preferred in that country. In Britain people use dd/mm/yy, so the Thatcher article has to reflect that. FearÉIREANN \(caint) 20:07, 27 October 2005 (UTC)

November 2005
This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

Audrey Hepburn
In the unlikely event the anonymous user who placed the erroneous information about Audrey Hepbrun returns - her birth certificate says her first name was Audrey, not "Andrey" as you put. Please see www.accuracyproject.org/cbe-Hepburn,Audrey.html.

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. 00:04, 14 November 2005 (UTC)

Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. --Winter 02:21, 3 January 2006 (UTC)

Jan. 2006 (spam links)
Please do not add commercial links (or links to your own private websites) to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or a mere collection of external links. You are, however, encouraged to add content instead of links to the encyclopedia. See the welcome page to learn more. Thanks. --Madchester 03:54, 20 January 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to use Wikipedia for advertising, you will be blocked from editing. --Madchester 03:55, 20 January 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Latinus 23:41, 27 January 2006 (UTC)

February 2006
Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to Celtic F.C., are considered vandalism. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the hard work of others. Thanks. Demiurge 22:45, 8 February 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Maxwell Reed, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Jaco plane  23:24, 8 February 2006 (UTC)

March 2006
Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to The McNamara Brothers. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. A link to the edit I have identified as vandalism can be found here: link. If you believe this edit is not vandalism, please contact me. AmiDaniel (Talk) 02:24, 22 March 2006 (UTC)

April 2006
Yes, Rms, I do. Mackensen (talk) 22:54, 26 April 2006 (UTC)

This account has been temporarily blocked for repeated vandalism of articles. The block is time limited and will expire shortly.

Wikipedia apologies to those many genuine users who use this IP and who now find themselves blocked. It was a necessary short term act to stop an individual from constantly vandalising this site.

Further vandalism of this site using this IP number may lead to further blocks being imposed.

FearÉIREANN \(caint) 23:01, 26 April 2006 (UTC)

Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on the contributor; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks may lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. It is important to keep a cool head, despite any comments against you. Personal attacks and disruptive comments only escalate a situation; please keep calm and action can be taken against the other parties if necessary. Your involvement in attacking back can only satisfy trolls or anger contributors, and lead to general bad feeling. Please try to remain civil with your comments. Thanks! —   nath a nrd o tcom (T • C • W) 04:52, 27 April 2006 (UTC)

May 2006
Your recent edit to Bhogireddy was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept our apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot2 08:39, 1 May 2006 (UTC)

June 2006
Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Seattle Seahawks. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Tachyon01 22:39, 4 June 2006 (UTC)

June 2006
Please do not add commercial links (or links to your own private websites) to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or a mere collection of external links. You are, however, encouraged to add content instead of links to the encyclopaedia. If you feel the link should be added to the article please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. See the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thanks. -- Alias Flood 20:09, 10 June 2006 (UTC)

Your edit to Internet pornography
Your recent edit to Internet pornography was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot2 05:10, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia for repeated vandalism. If or when the block expires, please refrain from vandalizing or this account will face longer blocks, and action could be taken against the individual who uses it. Roy A.A. 16:51, 2 July 2006 (UTC)

Regarding edits made during July 8 2006 (UTC)
Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If this is an IP address, and it is shared by multiple users, ignore this warning if you did not make any unconstructive edits. John Lake 02:22, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

Three revert rule violation to African Jew
You are in danger of violating the three-revert rule on. Please cease further reverts or you may be blocked from further editing. --Lo2u 11:33, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

African Jew
Hi. I'm posting this message on several accounts in the hope that you'll read it. I've been watching what's been going on recently with this page and I think something needs to be done about it. There are at least four editors (myself included) who seem ready to revert your edits as soon as they are made and there seems little point in your continuing to make them. Let me say I'm not Jewish; I'm not African and I don't know much or have strong opinions about either; I do however trust Kaelus and Ehav on the basis of their editing history and the contents of their talk pages to make rational edits. The reason I keep reverting is that I just don't understand the rationale for removing every occurrence of the word Jew from a page about Jews and I can only conclude that this is politically motivated - please tell me if I'm wrong. In the last few hours I've overlooked a violation of the three reverts rule and the probable use of a second account to circumvent this rule, both of which could potentially get you blocked and I'm hoping I can persuade you to talk about your changes, in line with normal Wikipedia policy rather than constantly reverting to the same version. If you have a problem with the nature of the article or with the current terminology used it might be in your own interests, in order to create a final page that is acceptable to you, to discuss your changes and to try to work towards consensus. Other users have explained their reverts on the article's talk page - why not do the same? At the moment you're coming very close to being blocked. If you would like to reply to this message please do so on my talk page; if you would like to talk about the African Jew article, please do so on the article's talk page. Thank you for reading. --Lo2u 01:22, 9 July 2006 (UTC)

Sathya Sai Baba
Please do not blank sections on the Sathya Sai Baba article. Doing so constitutes vandalism. If you want to get involved in a discussion regarding this material, please register, obtain a user name and discuss your proposed edits on the talk page before making them. Thank you. SSS108 talk-email 03:56, 18 July 2006 (UTC)

August 2006
Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Batman. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 19:34, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

Oct 06
Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Kelly Ayotte. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. - CrazyRussian talk/email 11:50, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to Lou Pearlman, are considered vandalism. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the hard work of others. Thanks. - RoyBoy 800 15:49, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

Your repeated blanking of sourced text at Jim Morrison
Please stop. If you continue to remove content from pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Kathryn NicDhàna 20:03, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

Your edits to Dobsonian telescope
Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Unfortunately, the commercial links/content you added were inappropriate, as Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and should not be used for advertising or a collection of external links. See the welcome page if you'd like to learn more about contributing to the encyclopedia. Thanks! --KeithB 19:28, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

Your edits to Vandenberg AFB Space Launch Complex 6
Hello, I noticed you added a section to the Vandenberg AFB Space Launch Complex 6 article regarding overflight of Cuban airspace. I could not find any sources to confirm this, and also I believe that the line above your edit (large population centers) also includes Cuba. If you can find a source that confirms this, please feel free to reinsert your edit.

No harm is intended; I just want to make sure that everything is backed up.

Sincerely, Nick L. 21:01, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

Spam notice
Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that exist to attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam policies for further explanations of links that are considered appropriate. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. See the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Gwernol 20:40, 24 November 2006 (UTC)

Your edit to Glenn Beck
Your recent edit to Glenn Beck (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 18:24, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

Regarding edits made 18 February 2007 to Items in the Warcraft universe
This is your last warning. The next time you vandalise Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. BJ Talk 10:30, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

This is the only warning you will receive. If you vandalise Wikipedia once again, you will be blocked from editing. --Geniac 20:10, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

Superstreet example
Hello. I recently undid some edits referring to superstreet roadway geometry along US 301 in Maryland and I noticed that you had contributed to that portion of the article. Please see my post to the article's discussion page and feel free to add that information back in should you be able to provide any specific examples. Thanks! --Thisisbossi 03:52, 27 February 2007 (UTC)