User talk:64.119.211.126

July 2022
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. - LouisAragon (talk) 14:53, 8 July 2022 (UTC)


 * Good afternoon. I find it disturbing that you deleted what I contributed to this page as much of the information follows from the sources already listed. Instead of checking or asking for further sources, you simply deleted the information added to an already scant article. The only personal information cited was that the language in question is still spoken, and not extinct (as falsely claimed by the article). I do not know on what authority you are acting but if you could undo your delete of my work and time so I can update the sources in the manner you described, it would be appreciated. To be honest, I find it quite rude that you deleted the information without simply asking me to provide more citations. I see in your log of edits that you have a history of politicaly motivated edits and censorship about issues pertaining to the region in question. ADP 64.119.211.126 (talk) 17:17, 16 July 2022 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. - LouisAragon (talk) 14:54, 8 July 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Derbent, you may be blocked from editing. HistoryofIran (talk) 17:57, 16 July 2022 (UTC)

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. - LouisAragon (talk) 18:45, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
 * For admins that are passing by. This IP user insists on changing long-standing content through sheer edit-warring and by making baseless accusations of "political bias" and "censorship".
 * "I see in your log of edits that you have a history of politicaly motivated edits and censorship about issues pertaining to the region in question."
 * "The only personal information cited was that the language in question is still spoken, and not extinct (as falsely claimed by the article). "
 * "your attempt to control the information on this page and censor the information because you wish to portray this region in a way you pleaase."
 * "Politically motivated edit (1). "
 * "Politically motivated edit. (2)""
 * "Politically motivated edit (3)""
 * "Politically motivated edit (4)"
 * - LouisAragon (talk) 18:45, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
 * I understand you want me to provide better sources in some places - and trust me I will do so given time -- but also over the majority of the edits you have undone are merely spelling corrections or the addition or specific information already found in the sources provided by previous authors ( for example the substitution of the term middle east with specific places that are mentioned in the source, or when I corrected incorrect arabic like arabiyya sherwani -sic- for the correct arabiyya sherwaniyya - its feminine, your hypercorrection of populations to population - which is not correct given the context of sentence, etc) or information that is general or adressed in the wikipedia article in diffferent places. You also removed links to related topics claiming I need to add sources for them. I do not appreciate how you feel you have the authority to control this page and its information, or how you accuse me of bias and starting and edit war when it is you that is so shamefully policing this page and preventing its development. A lot of information on the original page is incorrect and unsourced, but you take no issue with that. Ironically, it is you that is engaging in a edit war based on your own political views and opinions. Anyways, I will be re editing the page soon with all proper sources -- but if I find you over policing the information again such as demanding sources for spelling errors, general knowledge, or information already cited and in the sources, I will be reporting you from my main account and seek resolution against you through the dispute resolution system. 64.119.211.126 (talk) 11:54, 17 July 2022 (UTC)

November 2022
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Shirvani Arabic, you may be blocked from editing. This is the last I'm warning you for adding unsourced information. HistoryofIran (talk) 23:58, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Ad Orientem (talk) 02:18, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.