User talk:64.121.103.144/Archive 1

— Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.121.103.144 (talk) 21:11, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
 * WikiProject_Spaceflight (project page, talk page)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Space Exploration (April 9)
 Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Space_Exploration Articles for creation help desk] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Robert McClenon was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: This draft has been resubmitted without any visible improvement, or with very little improvement. If you do not know what is needed to improve this draft, please ask for advice rather than making minor improvements and resubmitting.

You may ask for advice on how to improve this draft at the Teahouse or on the talk pages of any of the declining reviewers. (The declining reviewers may advise you to ask for advice at the Teahouse.)

If this draft is resubmitted without any improvement or with very little improvement again, it is likely to be rejected, and it may be nominated for deletion, or a topic-ban may even be requested against further submission by the responsible editor.

This version of this draft appears to have been expanded by transcluding multiple other articles, which is not the way that Wikipedia presents information and is not the way that Wikipedia articles are written.

This draft has been Rejected by a reviewer in the Articles for Creation review process. DO NOT resubmit this draft or attempt to resubmit this draft or prepare or submit a draft that is substantially the same as this draft without discussing the reasons for the rejection. You may request a discussion with the rejecting reviewer, or you may request a discussion with the community at the Teahouse. A discussion will not necessarily agree to a resubmission. If this draft is resubmitted, or an attempt is made to resubmit this draft or an equivalent draft, without addressing the reasons for the Rejection, a topic-ban or a partial block may be requested against the submitting editor, and the draft may be nominated for deletion.

You may ask for advice about Rejection at the Teahouse.

Any additional information that is not in existing articles can be added to existing articles. Do not try to assemble a large article by transcluding other articles.

Robert McClenon (talk) 01:39, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Draft:Starship SN11
Draft:Starship SN11, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Starship SN11 and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Starship SN11 during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Robert McClenon (talk) 04:27, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Starship SN15 (April 9)
 Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Starship_SN15 Articles for creation help desk] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Robert McClenon was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: There is no reason to think that individual test vehicles of this experimental space vehicle class are notable.

This draft has been Rejected by a reviewer in the Articles for Creation review process. DO NOT resubmit this draft or attempt to resubmit this draft or prepare or submit a draft that is substantially the same as this draft without discussing the reasons for the rejection. You may request a discussion with the rejecting reviewer, or you may request a discussion with the community at the Teahouse. A discussion will not necessarily agree to a resubmission.

It should be noted that the reviewer has not decided that the topic is not notable. An article on the topic may be accepted in the future. However, there is no reason to think that this draft will become an article, and there is evidence that this draft will never become an article. If there is to be an article on this topic, this draft must first be blown up and started over.

If this draft is resubmitted without discussion and without starting it over, or if an attempt is made to resubmit this draft or an equivalent draft, without addressing the reasons for the Rejection by starting over, a partial block or a topic-ban may be requested against the submitting editor.

You may ask for advice about Rejection at the Teahouse.

Robert McClenon (talk) 04:30, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Starship SN11 (April 9)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Robert McClenon were:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Starship SN11 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Starship SN11, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Starship_SN11 Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Robert_McClenon&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Starship_SN11 reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 06:55, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hello! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay. You are welcome to edit anonymously; however, creating an account is free and has several benefits (for example, the ability to create pages, upload media and edit without one's IP address being visible to the public).

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Robert McClenon (talk) 17:18, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

A Few Suggestions
I have a few comments, although you probably won't pay attention to them, just as you have ignored other advice:

1. Register an account. There really are a few advantages to registering an account. Most of the disadvantages of registering an account are fictitious.

2. We have no idea why you think that the Road Closures are encyclopedic.

3. We know that you have been working hard on this. That doesn't mean that your hard work has been doing either you or us or anyone else any good.

4. Continue to discuss at WikiProject Spaceflight. You may not get the answers that you want, but you might not get them anywhere else either.

5. Articles are not creating by transcluding other articles.

Robert McClenon (talk) 17:27, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Draft:Starship SN15
Draft:Starship SN15, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Starship SN15 and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Starship SN15 during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Robert McClenon (talk) 17:34, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

April 2021
Hello, I'm Terasail. I noticed that you recently removed content from SpaceX Starship without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Terasail &#91;✉&#93; 18:48, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You were warned not to persist with your disruptive editing, you chose to ignore those warnings, as such, you're now blocked for 36 hours. Nick (talk) 19:10, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at WP:TEA, you may be blocked from editing. ''Your claim at the Teahouse that you need help in enforcing a dispute resolution is misleading. The two filings at DRN were both closed without action. Making misleading claims may result in another block.'' Robert McClenon (talk) 17:52, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Sandbox
T

Account?
Do you have a Wikipedia User account? If yes, please use it. If no, please WP:Register. You are getting involved in too many areas for an unregistered IP, and getting into trouble, and as an IP it is very hard to recover from here. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 22:49, 9 April 2021 (UTC)