User talk:64.125.75.65

April 2013
Hello, I'm Yintan. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Batavia, Illinois, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks,   Yinta n   14:20, 30 April 2013 (UTC)

August 2013
This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at List of coupled cousins, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Favonian (talk) 17:53, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Flyer22. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Trust, but verify, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Flyer22 (talk) 13:41, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

July 2014
Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ''This is a WP:BLP article. Conspiracy sites, etc cannot be used in such articles. '' Dougweller (talk) 14:45, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your recent editing history at Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi: shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. ''It looks very much as though you've edited through 2 IPs. You need to discuss this on the talk page,'' Dougweller (talk) 20:39, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.