User talk:64.18.45.47

November 2016
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Forth Bridge has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:04, 11 November 2016 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Forth Bridge was changed by 64.18.45.47 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.968507 on 2016-11-11T19:04:53+00:00.

September 2020
Hello, I'm Pamzeis. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Colony of Virginia have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Pamzeis (talk) 12:38, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2022
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Wheelchair rugby, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Serols (talk) 15:43, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Wheelchair rugby. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Serols (talk) 15:45, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Forth Bridge, you may be blocked from editing. Serols (talk) 15:46, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Forth Bridge. Serols (talk) 15:48, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours to prevent further vandalism. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 16:17, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

December 2022
This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Talk:Bread, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Zefr (talk) 14:57, 5 December 2022 (UTC)

January 2023
Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article, Dog health. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles, nor are such pages a forum. Thank you. Tarheel95 (Talk) 16:04, 3 January 2023 (UTC)