User talk:64.237.55.82

April 2007
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Daniel Wayne Smith, you will be blocked from editing. —TheWizard (Talk) 22:54, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Mozilla Firefox
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent contribution removed content from. Please be careful when editing pages and do not remove content from Wikipedia without a good reason, which should be specified in the edit summary. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Owen&times; &#9742;  22:19, 23 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Sorry, noticed it then as well. The POST request didnt go through as supposed. 64.237.55.82 22:32, 23 August 2007 (UTC)


 * No problem; this happens a lot. Owen&times; &#9742;  23:44, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

I notice you keep adding information about Opera, seemingly unrelated to Firefox, to the Firefox article. Could you explain your edits on the Firefox talk page? -- Schapel 14:19, 24 August 2007 (UTC)


 * As there is already a comparison to other popular browsers, it seems obvious to list also the third most popular one, which Opera is usually/often considered as. 64.237.55.82 10:46, 25 August 2007 (UTC)


 * First of all, there is not a comparison to "other popular browsers". The comparisons in the article are between Firefox and Internet Explorer, which are the same comparisons in the sources cited. Second of all, Opera is clearly not the third most popular browser, but Safari is. It's not obvious at all to put a comparison to Opera in the paragraph. It's artificially tacking on a statement about Opera on its own in a paragraph that is comparing Internet Explorer and Firefox. Anyway, there's already a link to a comparison of the known vulnerabilities of all popular browsers earlier in the section. Before you make another edit, please discuss it on the talk page. Thanks. -- Schapel 14:45, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Also, as it is being included it is a random factoid and doesn't flow with the prior sentence. If it were to flow it would need some way of relating it to Firefox, and that would require an external source to support it else it would be in violation of verifiability policy and original research policy.-Localzuk(talk) 15:13, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

3RR
Please note that your ongoing re-insertion of the Opera information is in violation of the 3 revert rule. If you reinsert again, I will report you to be blocked.-Localzuk(talk) 15:13, 25 August 2007 (UTC)