User talk:64.251.48.136

January 2010
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to African-American Civil Rights Movement (1955–1968). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 19:15, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. 99.12.243.20 (talk) 16:22, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 15:48, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

December 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Harlem, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you. --some jerk on the Internet   (talk)  15:36, 10 December 2010 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to Harlem constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 (Contact) 15:37, 10 December 2010 (UTC)

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Harlem. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. d m  z  15:37, 10 December 2010 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Harlem. d m  z  15:40, 10 December 2010 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. -- Ed (Edgar181) 15:42, 10 December 2010 (UTC)

December 2011
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Gunpei Yokoi, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=467188322 here]. A520 &#124;   Talk me away! / sign it! 14:18, 22 December 2011 (UTC)

June 2013
Hello, I'm Yintan. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to George B. McClellan, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.  Yinta n  12:33, 14 June 2013 (UTC)

January 2020
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. -- The Anome (talk) 19:25, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

May 2021
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Fiberglass. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ExclusiveEditor (talk) 15:18, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

October 2021
Hello, I'm The Tips of Apmh. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Industrial robot have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse.   The Tips of Apmh (talk) 17:40, 12 October 2021 (UTC)

March 2022
Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article, Jet pack. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles, nor are such pages a forum. Thank you. signed, 511KeV    (talk) 14:17, 23 March 2022 (UTC)