User talk:64.251.52.4

October 2009
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Happysailor (Talk) 14:34, 7 October 2009 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Reconstruction Acts. Jusda fax  18:08, 8 October 2009 (UTC)

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. B figura (talk) 16:41, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to John Dalton, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: John Dalton was changed by 64.251.52.4 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2009-10-28T13:57:56+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 13:58, 28 October 2009 (UTC)

November 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. Your test on the page Mythology worked, and has been removed. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing and its related help page for more information. Thank you. SimonD (talk) 13:03, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

To edit, please create an account and log in Due to persistent vandalism, anonymous editing from your school, library or institution's IP address  disabled. You will continue to have access to read the encyclopedia. If you are logged in but still unable to edit, please follow these instructions. To prevent abuse, account creation via this IP address may also be disabled. If editing is required for class projects, please have your instructor or network administrator contact us (with reference to this IP address) at [mailto:unblock-en-l@lists.wikimedia.org unblock-en-l] from an email address listed on your school's website. Alternatively, if you have no Internet access at home, you may [mailto:unblock-en-l@lists.wikimedia.org email us] using your school-issued email address, telling us your preferred username. Or you may use the form here. An account will be created for you. Please check on [ this list] that the username you choose has not already been taken. Thank you.

November 2010
Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to The Godfather, even if you intend to fix them later. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. MarnetteD | Talk 18:06, 30 November 2010 (UTC)

December 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. Your test on the page Dolomite worked, and has been removed. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing and its related help page for more information. Thank you. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 (Contact) 13:50, 10 December 2010 (UTC)

January 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article.  Wikipelli  Talk   14:15, 10 January 2011 (UTC)

February 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Nickel has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you.  - down  load  ׀  sign!  19:21, 24 February 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Deception Point for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Deception Point is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Deception Point until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Topperfalkon (talk) 17:33, 8 November 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Deception Point for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Deception Point is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Deception Point& until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. 17jiangz1 (talk) 06:52, 17 May 2021 (UTC)