User talk:64.251.54.66

Warnings
 Note: Always remember to substitute user warning templates. For help on user warnings, see the WikiProject on User Warnings. Older warnings may have been deleted, but are still visible in the [ page history]. [Admin: block | [ unblock] / Info: contribs | interiot's tool | [ page moves] | [ block log] | [ block list]]

April 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Vivio Testa rossa  Talk Who 12:27, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Wolcott, Connecticut. Your edits have been automatically marked as unconstructive/possible vandalism and have been automatically reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Wolcott, Connecticut was changed by 64.251.54.66 (u) (t) blanking the page on 2008-04-02T08:27:42+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 12:27, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. E Wing (talk) 12:28, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Your recent edit to Ray Charles (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 14:56, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

Hi, the recent edit you made to Man Man has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Prashanthns (talk) 13:31, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. --Art Smart (talk) 14:50, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to Man Man constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. Prashanthns (talk) 13:32, 22 April 2008 (UTC))

Your recent edit to Miele (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 14:05, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

April 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Adobe Photoshop has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Bradjamesbrown (talk) 16:58, 28 April 2010 (UTC)

May 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Alexander Milne Calder has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Hús ö  nd  16:35, 6 May 2010 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Flying fish. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Chuunen Baka (talk) 14:22, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

December 2011
Hello, and welcome! Although everyone is welcome to contribute, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Latin Kings (gang) with this edit, did not appear to be constructive, and has been reverted or removed. Thank you!  Alex discussion ★ 12:59, 1 December 2011 (UTC)

February 2012
This is the only warning you will receive. Your recent vandalism will not be tolerated. Although vandalizing articles on occasions that are days or weeks apart from each other sometimes prevents editors from being blocked, your continued vandalism constitutes a long term pattern of abuse. The next time you vandalize a page, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia without further notice. Calabe1992 14:38, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Madrid, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=475434594 here]. Wiki13 (talk) 18:26, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Galicia (Spain). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The reverted edit can be found [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=475434645 here]. Wiki13 (talk) 18:26, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Galicia (Spain), you may be blocked from editing. The reverted edit can be found [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=475434979 here]. Wiki13 (talk) 18:28, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Sling (weapon), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Denisarona (talk) 14:32, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

February 2015
Hello, I'm Strongjam. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Scott Peterson because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Strongjam (talk) 18:50, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Pope John Paul I. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Marteau (talk) 17:33, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Recent edit to Wolcott, Connecticut
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Wolcott, Connecticut, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! DemocraticLuntz (talk) 16:47, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

April 2015
Hello, I'm DemocraticLuntz. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Wolcott, Connecticut because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. DemocraticLuntz (talk) 16:50, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Wolcott, Connecticut. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Yamaguchi%E5%85%88%E7%94%9F&action=edit&amp;section=new Yamaguchi先生] 16:52, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Wolcott, Connecticut, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Yamaguchi%E5%85%88%E7%94%9F&action=edit&amp;section=new Yamaguchi先生] 16:56, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Wolcott, Connecticut. —S MALL JIM   17:01, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

March 2020
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Wax paper has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:18, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Wax paper was changed by 64.251.54.66 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.963555 on 2020-03-11T15:17:59+00:00