User talk:64.251.58.115

March 2014
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Radiocarbon dating has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Radiocarbon dating was changed by 64.251.58.115 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.894091 on 2014-03-20T15:34:37+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:34, 20 March 2014 (UTC)

September 2014
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Gateway Arch. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. -- DonIago (talk) 16:22, 9 September 2014 (UTC)

October 2014
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Ford Model T, you may be blocked from editing. Andy Dingley (talk) 16:35, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2015
Hello, I'm MusikAnimal. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Epitome Astronomiae Copernicanae— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. &mdash; MusikAnimal  talk  16:50, 23 April 2015 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Henry Golden Dearth. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in loss of editing privileges. Widr (talk) 19:42, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2015
Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to New York Mets, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. – Gilliam (talk) 13:13, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2016
Hello, I'm Gilliam. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Joseph Glanvill has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. – Gilliam (talk) 16:25, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Recent edits to Jenny Slate
Hello. I noticed that you made an edit to a biography of a living person (Jenny Slate), but that you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 11:46, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

May 2016
Hello, I'm Wikipelli. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Kōan (Kamakura period)— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.   Wikipelli Talk   12:15, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

June 2016
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Brazilian art has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:51, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Brazilian art was changed by 64.251.58.115 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.894107 on 2016-06-06T17:51:43+00:00.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Brazilian art. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. CAPTAIN RAJU ( ✉ ) 17:54, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Bids for the 2016 Summer Olympics, you may be blocked from editing. Widr (talk) 18:37, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Brazilian Air Force. CAPTAIN RAJU ( ✉ ) 18:28, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

December 2016
Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Andrew Benintendi— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Serols (talk) 19:04, 21 December 2016 (UTC)

February 2017
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Sacramento Kings, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Shellwood (talk) 14:19, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2017
Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to List of colleges and universities in North Carolina— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Serols (talk) 14:16, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

September 2019
Hello, I'm Samf4u. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Shake Shack— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Samf4u (talk) 13:31, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

October 2019
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Gaston. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Nyook  ✉ 16:23, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2020
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to POG—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 18:26, 24 November 2020 (UTC)