User talk:64.26.103.38

February 2017
Hello, I'm Excirial. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Korean garden— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Excirial ( Contact me, Contribs ) 20:38, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2017
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Chronological list of American classical composers has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:34, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Chronological list of American classical composers was changed by 64.26.103.38 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.955699 on 2017-03-17T15:34:44+00:00.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Chronological list of American classical composers. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Shellwood (talk) 15:36, 17 March 2017 (UTC)

May 2017
Hello, I'm Shellwood. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Little Rock, Arkansas— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Shellwood (talk) 18:09, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

November 2017
Hello, I'm Oshwah. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Panic of 1819— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   16:45, 1 November 2017 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Panic of 1819. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   17:01, 1 November 2017 (UTC)

February 2018
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Intelligence quotient has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:36, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Intelligence quotient was changed by 64.26.103.38 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.896545 on 2018-02-15T13:36:55+00:00.

April 2018
Hello, I'm Kondavarsha. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Samuel Colt have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks.  Varsha&#124;talk   18:11, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Samuel Colt. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Serols (talk) 18:17, 17 April 2018 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Heinz, you may be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Heinz was changed by 64.26.103.38 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.870238 on 2018-04-18T18:16:39+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:16, 18 April 2018 (UTC)

May 2018
Hello, I'm Afootpluto. An edit that you recently made to Dark romanticism seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Afootpluto (talk) 17:46, 3 May 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2019
Hello, I'm CAPTAIN MEDUSA. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Mérida, Yucatán have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. ___CAPTAIN MEDUSA talk   17:27, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Culture of Chile. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Jusdafax (talk) 12:38, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

October 2019
Hello, I'm Samf4u. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Pinckney's Treaty—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Samf4u (talk) 12:35, 28 October 2019 (UTC)