User talk:64.4.100.206

February 2014
Hello, I'm Mark Arsten. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Francis (given name), but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Mark Arsten (talk) 00:15, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

January 2015
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Pokémon (video game series) has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Pokémon (video game series) was changed by 64.4.100.206 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.874302 on 2015-01-21T22:31:23+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 22:31, 21 January 2015 (UTC)

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 03:10, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

June 2016
Hello, I'm Oshwah. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Duncan Trussell— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   02:10, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Doug Stanhope with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   02:11, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Doug Stanhope with this edit, you may be blocked from editing.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   02:11, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Duncan Trussell.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   02:13, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistent vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Elockid Message me 02:16, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Widr (talk) 11:33, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

April 2017
Hello, I'm Oshwah. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Latin— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   23:10, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Clothing in ancient Rome. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   23:17, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Clothing in ancient Rome, you may be blocked from editing.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   23:20, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

November 2019
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Don Omar, you may be blocked from editing. The Eloquent Peasant (talk) 14:33, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

December 2019
Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Cortisol—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Serols (talk) 16:37, 7 December 2019 (UTC)