User talk:64.60.113.254

Hello,

Third time is a strike for vandalism, for me at least, please provide the source for adding such information at The Lazy Song article.

Kind Regards, MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 20:05, 29 January 2020 (UTC)

Again? MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 22:25, 29 January 2020 (UTC)

Vandalism, even once I have talked with you. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 00:36, 30 January 2020 (UTC)

This is like the tenth strike? MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 00:46, 30 January 2020 (UTC)

January 2020
Hello, I'm Almy. I noticed that you made a change to an article, The Lazy Song, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Almy (talk) 01:36, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Add a RELIABLE source to the article, NOT the edit summary
This is about The Lazy Song Almy (talk) 01:45, 30 January 2020 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, 64.60.113.254. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page The Lazy Song, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the request edit template);
 * disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Conflict of interest);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Almy (talk) 01:44, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2020
Please stop adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ''Seriously. Put a source in. It's been reverted 10+ times now.

Also, since you claim to be a producer, please disclose the conflict of interest.'' Almy (talk) 01:46, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia. Add a reliable source. Almy (talk) 01:49, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

External Link
An external link is what goes under the page. NOT a source. Please provide a reliable source. Almy (talk) 02:01, 30 January 2020 (UTC)

January 2020
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at The Lazy Song. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 02:16, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. —C.Fred (talk) 02:23, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

yeah but you can see my name in the tags there Fred. Ok all good I guess theres no way I can convince you but I did produced this video. Honestly seems to me you're a community of bullies. theres a bout a dozen different ways to see here that I produced it. anyway thanks for your efforts and exploring the link I provided. https://www.imdb.com/news/ni9638029?ref_=nm_nwr2 https://www.imdb.com/title/tt6837512/fullcredits?ref_=tt_cl_sm#cast https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:MarioSoulTruthFan http://next2shine.com/music-video-bruno-mars-the-lazy-song https://brunomars.fandom.com/wiki/The_Lazy_Song http://www.tabri.com https://vimeo.com/tabri/ http://www.imdb.com/name/nm1151269/ https://www.linkedin.com/in/tabri/?trk=public-profile-join-page
 * A couple of notes. IMDB is of limited reliability as a source. The one source you mentioned that looked promising, http://next2shine.com/music-video-bruno-mars-the-lazy-song, did not mention the producers' names. —C.Fred (talk) 02:26, 30 January 2020 (UTC)


 * The block has nothing to do with whether you did or didn't produce the video. It has everything to do with the fact that you kept re-adding it to the article and refused to engage in discussion. Of those links you gave, the only independent reliable source is the Next2Shine story, and they didn't mention producers' names. —C.Fred (talk) 03:43, 30 January 2020 (UTC)

yeah but you can see my name in the tags there. on the next 2 shine link if you look at the tags. obviously I ended up there because I produced it. im not sure what you mean by I refused to engage in discussion. im new here im used to emailing people this edit page adding comments is totally foreign to me took me a minute to figure it out. I did my best to provide multiple sources and links. I would have to be pretty twisted to fabricate all this. clearly that soul truth Mario guy has very little interest in the truth or accurate info he just has the page on lock down for some strange reason. and then you say imdb is not a reliable source but when I follow this article it says different.Reliable sources/Perennial sources "The use of IMDb as an external link is generally considered appropriate." anyway, all good - clearly you all have some hidden agenda that I don’t have time to figure out. I spent a day and half on this already. regardless, thanks for your time Fred; were all out here just trying to find our way sometimes we bump into each other. no hard feelings ;)


 * We're not talking about inserting a link to IMDB, though; we're talking about using it as a source, and the top of the paragraph you quoted says "The content on IMDb is user-generated, and the site is considered unreliable by a majority of editors." Further, we cannot conclude that names tagged in the next2shine article are producers. Did Bruno Mars produce the video too? The Smeezingtons? They're tagged as well.
 * There is no hidden agenda here. If anything, we're very open about policies, including WP:Conflict of interest, which says that parties with a conflict should not edit the articles where they have conflicts. So, if you are the producer as you claim, you should not be adding your name to any articles. —C.Fred (talk) 20:53, 30 January 2020 (UTC)

yeah I don’t think thats for a credit. im stating a fact not an opinion; that conflict would be say if I was editing the part about critical reception: the quality of the video or the quality of the job that I did. certainly not the fact that I did the job, which is not debatable. anyway like I said - all good Fred just have to agree to disagree and obviously im powerless to stop you all from running your little fiefdom how you see fit. luckily I have a decent career beyond editing a web page. best wishes ;)
 * There's no distinguishing line. You have a conflict regardless. However, it's usually tolerated to add neutrally-presented facts to article, if they are backed up with reliable sources. None of the reliable sources you've provided have supported the claim, so other editors have been entirely correct to remove material that cannot be verified. —C.Fred (talk) 21:06, 30 January 2020 (UTC)

Like I said agree to disagree. you guys have your own agenda and I don’t have the time or inclination to figure it out. all good!