User talk:64.60.211.2

April 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Pinocchio, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Pinocchio was changed by 64.60.211.2 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2009-04-16T23:21:32+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 23:21, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Virginity. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you.  - down  load  |   sign!  23:23, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

Joseph Jefferson Award
Hello, please don't add non-notable entries to lists or list articles. Usually such lists include only entries that already have their own Wikipedia article, and are considered "notable" in Wikipedia's sense of the term - see also WP:GNG and WP:NOTDIRECTORY for more information. A complete list of all recipients is available at the organization's homepage anyway. Thank you for your consideration. GermanJoe (talk) 21:20, 16 April 2016 (UTC)

April 2016
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Sleuth (1972 film). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.  Peter  Sam   Fan  21:34, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Waiting for Godot with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Donner60 (talk) 01:51, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

May 2016
Please stop spamming theatre articles with information about non-notable actors in non-notable productions. -- Ssilvers (talk) 00:16, 26 May 2016 (UTC)

June 2016
Please stop spamming overly detailed information about non-notable actors and companies into Wikipedia articles. Entries in lists should generally be notable (in Wikipedia's sense of the term - see WP:GNG). Other information in articles should follow content guidelines like WP:NPOV and WP:WEIGHT. In case you are somehow connected with this actor or his company, you should also read and follow Wikipedia's "conflict of interest" guideline at WP:COI. GermanJoe (talk) 00:18, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
 * As you continue to spam this disputed content, I have reported the issue at Conflict of interest/Noticeboard to discuss your editing and a possible "conflict of interest". Feel free to join the discussion over there. Regards. GermanJoe (talk) 16:19, 9 June 2016 (UTC)

September 2016
This is your only warning; if you use Wikipedia for soapboxing, promotion or advertising again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Promotion for Darryl Maximilian Robinson and his company. GermanJoe (talk) 18:09, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2016
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to The Pirates of Penzance, appears to have been inappropriate, and has been reverted. Please feel free to use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. That's not how references are added; please read Help:Referencing for beginners. --David Biddulph (talk) 00:13, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

The recent edits you made to The Fantasticks constitute reference spam and have been reverted. Please do not add spam to Wikipedia pages. If you believe that the addition was useful, please explain it on the article's Talk page. Thank you. -- Ssilvers (talk) 08:49, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

March 2017
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 year for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Neil N  talk to me 16:06, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

October 2019
Your recent editing history at Night of January 16th shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. RL0919 (talk) 20:11, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2020
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Waiting for Godot. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Ghmyrtle (talk) 17:02, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Ghmyrtle (talk) 17:14, 29 January 2020 (UTC)