User talk:64.62.138.21

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, one or more of the See also entries you added do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. The issue is not just whether they are commercial, it is whether they directly relate to the article. KillerChihuahua?!? 11:57, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

Article talk pages
It's not too much to ask editors to work with other editors on a publication being worked on by multiple people. If you think your additions are relevant, and more relevant than other similar publications by other publishers, simply list them on the article's talk page and discuss them with the other editors of the article. Also, reveal any conflicts of interest you might have, such as why you pick publications by a particular publisher or publishers, particularly in cases where the leading publication in the field is not the one you have added. KP Botany 18:02, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

September 2007
Please start paying atttention. The way you are adding the titles is not good, just as KP says. Only the important ones should be added--usually decided by the information from Journal Citation Reports for either total citations or impact factor. I think it is more likely that you are doing a careless job than commercial spam, because I note you have included a few--a very few--non commercial journals.

I warn you though that the way you are doing this is absolutely not acceptable on WP. Neither is the adding of see alsos to only peripherally related subjects. Please stop, identify any COI, and discuss it here. I would not like to have to block, although I certainly can, but cleaning up after you is getting to be a nuisance. DGG (talk) 03:40, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

I see a large number of similar links have been added. (Every one of them is being removed.) And therefore, in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for. Please stop. You're welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text below.

I warn you that if you attempt to use any other address for similar links, it will be blocked immediately.

I further alert you that we have the full cooperation of some of the publishers whose material you have been adding. They understand well that this can only rebound to their discredit. They have been informed, and well understand, that this will have a negative effect on their reputation, and tend to produce a very careful scrutiny of any links to their publications, even ones that might be more appropriate, and possibly also to articles about those titles. DGG (talk) 02:11, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

Editing without a username
You are welcome to continue editing articles without logging in, but you may wish to  [ create an account] . Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits. For one thing, if you edit without a username, your IP address is used to identify you instead.

--Slashme 07:58, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

Can this page be shared by others???
Let me continue to talk the issue on the page User talk:64.62.138.34 since that page is unaccessable at the moment.

According to what zzuuzz says, he found that 64.62.138.34 has done some thing with the pages of Belgium and Food safety. I cann't recall anything that I have done with Belgium page, as I don't know very much about Belgium. However, I do recall that I did something with the Food safety page and I noticed that once upon I hit the buttom the errors appeared on the pages where it was not supposed to be. This could be something to do with the ghost/or spirts intrusion as the IP address of 64.62.138.XX indicated.

zzuuzz, would you please suggest me an open proxy that is accessable and editable to your site. As I mentioned before, I'm unable to access to your site without open proxy

To be honest to say....
Current computer security system can only prevent human hackers but being far away from the technologies that are capable of preventing the disasters generated by aliens/spirits/ghosts etc