User talk:64.8.142.99

September 2018
Hello, I'm Tornado chaser. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Learning styles ‎ have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Tornado chaser (talk) 18:56, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

November 2018
Hello, I'm CASSIOPEIA. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to List of tallest people— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks.  CASSIOPEIA(talk) 17:23, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

December 2018
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Ivan L. Moody. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Jessicapierce (talk) 21:37, 18 December 2018 (UTC)

February 2019
Hello, I'm 49TL. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Charles Lindbergh have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. 49 TL  18:22, 14 February 2019 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Charles Alfred Pillsbury. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. IronGargoyle (talk) 17:57, 22 February 2019 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Pete Docter, you may be blocked from editing. 49 TL  18:50, 22 February 2019 (UTC)

May 2019
Hello, I'm 7 qz. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Daily have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. A Dolphin (squeek?) 14:59, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2019
Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Francis Bacon— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Serols (talk) 15:09, 24 October 2019 (UTC)

January 2021
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Benson, Minnesota, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 16:48, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Materialscientist (talk) 16:51, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

April 2021
Hello, I'm Asartea. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Judy Garland—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. -- Asartea   Talk  undefined  Contribs  14:56, 23 April 2021 (UTC)

November 2021
Hello, I'm HelenDegenerate. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Park Güell have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Helen (💬📖) 17:05, 16 November 2021 (UTC)

December 2021
 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked temporarily from editing for making (or attempting to make) disruptive edits that repeatedly triggered the edit filter. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. clpo13(talk) 20:29, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

February 2022
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Murder of Jacob Wetterling have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:06, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Murder of Jacob Wetterling was changed by 64.8.142.99 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.890448 on 2022-02-25T15:06:07+00:00

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Jesse Ventura. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ... disco spinster   talk  18:55, 28 February 2022 (UTC)

March 2022
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Joe Mauer, you may be blocked from editing. Serols (talk) 15:54, 3 March 2022 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Rubbish computer. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Larry Fitzgerald have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Rubbish computer Ping me or leave a message on my talk page 18:33, 14 March 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Isaac Asimov, you may be blocked from editing. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 17:43, 25 March 2022 (UTC)

April 2022
Hello, I'm Peculiar Undertone. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Bracelet—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Peculiar Undertone (talk) 15:42, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Bracelet. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. M.Bitton (talk) 15:45, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Bracelet, you may be blocked from editing. Serols (talk) 15:54, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

November 2022
Hello, I'm Hey man im josh. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Betsy Bakker-Nort—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Hey man im josh (talk) 15:16, 21 November 2022 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Marie Tharp. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:51, 21 November 2022 (UTC)
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Marie Tharp was changed by 64.8.142.99 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.885645 on 2022-11-21T18:51:14+00:00