User talk:64.83.242.122

March 2014
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Arch bridge has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Arch bridge was changed by 64.83.242.122 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.966518 on 2014-03-19T18:31:33+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:31, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

May 2017
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to United States in the 1950s has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:41, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: United States in the 1950s was changed by 64.83.242.122 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.86682 on 2017-05-08T15:41:40+00:00.

February 2018
Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Emmett Chappelle— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Serols (talk) 16:38, 6 February 2018 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Ral 33 (talk) 16:41, 6 February 2018 (UTC)

October 2019
Hello, I'm Johndavies837. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Freedom of speech have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. Johndavies837 (talk) 14:59, 15 October 2019 (UTC)

February 2021
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Lois Lowry. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.   Catalyzzt (talk) 17:40, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2021
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at 1999 Bridge Creek–Moore tornado. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. TornadoLGS (talk) 01:12, 24 September 2021 (UTC)

April 2022
Although everyone is welcome to edit Wikipedia, some of your recent edits to Siegfried Bettmann were not considered constructive. These edits constitute vandalism and have been reverted. Please bear in mind that there are many ways to make a more useful (and more fun) contribution to the encyclopedia. Mark in wiki (talk) 16:31, 29 April 2022 (UTC)