User talk:64.88.4.240

April 2017
Hello, I'm Sparkzy. An edit that you recently made to Harsens Island seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! S PARKZY  14:12, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Harsens Island. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. S PARKZY  14:22, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2017
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Space Race has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:52, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Space Race was changed by 64.88.4.240 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.876911 on 2017-04-19T15:52:54+00:00.

May 2017
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Nut. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Crow Caw  17:54, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. —72 talk 14:13, 31 May 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Abraham, you may be blocked from editing. — Paleo  Neonate  — 18:11, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

September 2017
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows – Part 2 has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:39, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows – Part 2 was changed by 64.88.4.240 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.897282 on 2017-09-14T13:39:50+00:00.

October 2017
Hello, I'm Optakeover. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Beethoven's musical style— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Optakeover (U)(T)(C) 13:39, 16 October 2017 (UTC)

November 2017
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Rat Islands has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:13, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Rat Islands was changed by 64.88.4.240 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.964292 on 2017-11-03T17:13:13+00:00.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Rat Islands. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Dat GuyTalkContribs 17:15, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

December 2018
Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Meerkat— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Serols (talk) 18:02, 12 December 2018 (UTC)

March 2019
Hello, I'm CLCStudent. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Opioid epidemic have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. CLCStudent (talk) 16:11, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Opioid epidemic. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Serols (talk) 16:22, 4 March 2019 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. OhNo itsJamie Talk 16:31, 4 March 2019 (UTC)

Wonderful Christmas Time
Hi - Saw your edits on the subject page. Your edit to add in Diana Ross was good as her album went Gold. Thank you.

The issue here is that lists like the section you edited become long Trivia grab bags where everyone who has a favorite version adds it in without citation or context. By putting in a note about "notability", it challenges the editors to ensure that their versions are actually that as well as giving an easy out for established editors to apply haircuts when the added version is clearly not notable.

Beyond that, I'd challenge your complaint about covers being non-notable by definition. Just look at the pages for Blue Christmas (song), I'll Be Home For Christmas, or White Christmas (song) (just to name a few Christmas songs) or any of dozens non-Christmas song pages which have VERY notable, charting covers, and well-cited "Notable Versions".

Happy editing! Yours - Ckruschke (talk) 19:24, 21 December 2020 (UTC)Ckruschke

March 2021
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Bix Beiderbecke, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. — Yours, Berrely  • Talk∕Contribs 16:59, 4 March 2021 (UTC)