User talk:65.155.187.2

November 2019
Hello, I'm Everedux. I noticed that in this edit to Persecution of Christians, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you.  Everedux  (talk)  21:40, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Persecution of Christians, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you.  Everedux  (talk)  21:41, 11 November 2019 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Persecution of Christians shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Tgeorgescu (talk) 21:42, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Persecution of Christians, you may be blocked from editing. Tgeorgescu (talk) 21:43, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you blank out or remove content from Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Persecution of Christians.  Everedux  (talk)  21:45, 11 November 2019 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. PhilKnight (talk) 23:01, 11 November 2019 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. Tgeorgescu (talk) 22:57, 11 November 2019 (UTC)

September 2020
Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Book Cliffs—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Serols (talk) 16:00, 3 September 2020 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Voting rights in the United States. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:49, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Voting rights in the United States was changed by 65.155.187.2 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.966383 on 2020-09-03T20:49:39+00:00

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Voting rights in the United States, you may be blocked from editing. Thegreatluigi (talk) 20:50, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2020
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Chromebook has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:11, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Chromebook was changed by 65.155.187.2 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.97145 on 2020-09-11T14:11:25+00:00

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Chromebook. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. OrangeGarfield (talk) 14:14, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2021
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Group 10 element have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:39, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Group 10 element was changed by 65.155.187.2 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.950728 on 2021-03-23T14:39:48+00:00

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Group 3 element. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:46, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Group 3 element was changed by 65.155.187.2 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.95619 on 2021-03-23T14:46:29+00:00

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Group 3 element, you may be blocked from editing. Eridian314 (talk) 14:49, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2022
Hello, I'm Perfect4th. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Werner Heisenberg have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Perfect4th (talk) 14:55, 16 May 2022 (UTC)

September 2022
Hello, I'm Hey man im josh. I noticed that in this edit to Bartholomew the Apostle, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Hey man im josh (talk) 17:31, 19 September 2022 (UTC)

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Mushroom. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. a! rado (C✙T) 17:35, 19 September 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Mushroom, you may be blocked from editing. Reda ctyll  Talk page  17:38, 19 September 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by introducing incorrect information, as you did with this edit to Mesosaurus. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 15:43, 28 September 2022 (UTC)

December 2022
Hello, I'm Teles. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Biblical Magi—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. —Teles « Talk to me ˱ M @ C S ˲» 16:55, 2 December 2022 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at John Simpson (journalist). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Someone who&#39;s wrong on the internet (talk) 21:20, 6 December 2022 (UTC)

August 2023
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to engage in subtle vandalism by making unexplained changes to information, as you did at Clouded leopard, you may be blocked from editing. Seawolf35 (talk) 20:38, 30 August 2023 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Clouded leopard. Seawolf35 (talk) 20:40, 30 August 2023 (UTC)

 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week to prevent further vandalism. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 20:59, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

September 2023
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Dry grassland have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:41, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Dry grassland was changed by 65.155.187.2 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.886816 on 2023-09-25T15:41:15+00:00