User talk:65.160.244.3

February 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Lorentz transformation has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Epbr123 (talk) 17:39, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to The Office (Around the World) constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Epbr123 (talk) 17:43, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to The Green Hornet (2011 film). If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Epbr123 (talk) 17:59, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

March 2011
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Divergent boundary. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Jan 1 naD (talk • contrib) 16:15, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 You recently made a submission to Articles for Creation. Your article has been reviewed and because some issues were found, it could not be accepted in its current form; it is now located at Wikipedia&. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. Feel free to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! - Happysailor  (Talk) 18:15, 14 October 2011 (UTC)

October 2011
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Basa lisk inspect damage ⁄berate  16:38, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. -- Ed (Edgar181) 17:29, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

Blocked for 48 hours
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for abuse of editing privileges. If you have a registered Wikipedia username, you may log in and continue to edit. Otherwise, once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. CapitalR (talk) 17:40, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

October 2012
Hello, I'm Klilidiplomus. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Humus without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Klilidiplomus+Talk 16:06, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Travis Porter. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Guðsþegn (talk) 17:30, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2012
Hello, I'm Weedwhacker128. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made to Journalist, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Weedwhacker128 (talk) 17:43, 16 November 2012 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Journalist with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Weedwhacker128 (talk) 17:44, 16 November 2012 (UTC)

January 2013
Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons, as you did to Trinidad James. Thank you. ⁓ Hello  71  17:39, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2013
Hello, I'm Avoided. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made to Mary, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Avoided (talk) 17:22, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Team Mindless


A tag has been placed on Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Team Mindless, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Northamerica1000(talk) 04:09, 21 June 2013 (UTC)