User talk:65.246.72.86

December 2018
Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to B. W. Webb. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Tornado chaser (talk) 21:21, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Mike McCarthy (American football), you may be blocked from editing. William Avery (talk) 21:45, 2 December 2018 (UTC)

It’s not vandalism when I’m telling the truth 🤷🏻‍♂️

April 2019
Hello, I'm LizardJr8. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to 2019 New York Giants season have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. LizardJr8 (talk) 20:21, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Recent edit to Jerry Reese
Hello. I noticed that you made an edit that introduces praise or promotional language to the Jerry Reese article. On Wikipedia, we adhere to a neutral point of view (NPOV) and avoid promotional language or puffery. Please read the NPOV policy page, as well as this page of language to avoid to better understand how to expand this article in a style suitable to an encyclopedia. If you have questions, please see the Help Desk page. Thank you! &#8213; Susmuffin Talk 23:57, 27 April 2019 (UTC)

January 2023
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 21:38, 19 January 2023 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Electoral Count Act. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you.  Material Works  (talk) 23:39, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at New Rochelle, New York, you may be blocked from editing. lavender &#124;(formerly HMSSolent )&#124; lambast 02:31, 20 January 2023 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at New Rochelle, New York. Sheep (talk • he/him) 14:30, 20 January 2023 (UTC)

 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours to prevent further vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Alexf(talk) 20:38, 20 January 2023 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Gresham College, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. ✯✬✩InterestGather (talk) 01:09, 25 January 2023 (UTC)

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to State University of New York at Canton. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. ✯✬✩InterestGather (talk) 01:36, 25 January 2023 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to use disruptive, inappropriate or hard-to-read formatting, as you did at Belize, you may be blocked from editing. There is a Wikipedia Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. ✯✬✩InterestGather (talk) 02:15, 25 January 2023 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Embassy of the United States, Tehran. Materialscientist (talk) 02:45, 25 January 2023 (UTC)