User talk:65.31.97.168

January 2021
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Cool Hand Luke, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Donner60 (talk) 05:29, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Cool Hand Luke
Hello there, thanks for pointing that out about the lead. Another user (the person who wrote you above this message) reverted your edit because it was placed in the article itself, and not in its talk page (Talk:Cool Hand Luke). That being said, I deleted that paragraph you mentioned, and replaced it with "use of religious imagery" (this use was referenced in a section down below with citations to books regarding the portrayal). It was not at all encyclopedic, and violated one of the fundamental rules of Wikipedia: Wikipedia IS NOT an essay.-- GDuwen  Holler!  14:24, 16 January 2021 (UTC)