User talk:65.35.213.223

May 2022
Hello, I'm David J Johnson. I noticed that you recently removed content from Arecibo message without adequately explaining why. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. I I suggest you read the answer to this hoax on the SETI Institute website, which comprehensively answers any questions.I was at the Institute at the time and involved in this matter. David J Johnson (talk) 10:54, 13 May 2022 (UTC)


 * Hello Mr. Johnson, So, who were the "People" that made this message? You cannot "confirm" that to which you have no evidence or who has never come forward and admitted. Personally, I don't care if you were on the moon when this message appeared, just because you feel/think/believe that this image/message was made by "People" simply because your understanding of the light years it would take to arrive here, doesn't really hold up to scrutiny. An example of this is if a smartphone was taken back in time to George Washington's day in the late 1700's it would be declared witchcraft. Now imagine explaining to Washington the process by which we traveled and landed on the moon? He again, would likely declare it witchcraft. So, is this a case of you declaring something as a hoax, claiming it to be done by "people" without any evidence that is actually was people? Your preconceived bias is evident because your hard-stance ignorance in even considering that their may be technology that would enable someone/thing other than "people" to travel any distance perform such feats? A truly honest and intelligent man would simply state "I do not know" not their own personal thoughts/feelings/ideas and/or notions on the matter. Anything else than "I don't know" without evidence to confirm or deny is an outright lie. So, are you a liar Mr. Johnson? 65.35.213.223 (talk) 01:03, 11 June 2022 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Arecibo message. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. bonadea contributions talk 16:28, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Arecibo message. ''All correct references are contained within article. See SETI Institute website. Thank you.'' David J Johnson (talk) 14:52, 25 May 2022 (UTC)