User talk:65.36.23.105

May 2024
Hello, I'm Waxworker. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Boobs in the Woods, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Waxworker (talk) 14:53, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Fast and Furry-ous, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Waxworker (talk) 12:42, 5 May 2024 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Boobs in the Woods. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 15:14, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Dime to Retire. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 05:33, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at 8 Ball Bunny. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 02:01, 12 May 2024 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at The Sour Puss, you may be blocked from editing. Waxworker (talk) 22:07, 31 May 2024 (UTC)

June 2024
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at The Abominable Snow Rabbit. Waxworker (talk) 21:43, 2 June 2024 (UTC)

July 2024
Hello, I'm Sumanuil. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to The Sour Puss have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks.  -  Sumanuil  '''. ''' (talk to me) 23:30, 12 July 2024 (UTC)