User talk:65.5.79.137

September 2011
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Kirk Herbstreit with this edit, did not appear to be constructive, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Nepenthes (talk) 17:58, 23 September 2011 (UTC)

December 2011
Hello, and welcome! Although everyone is welcome to contribute, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Sun Drop with this edit, did not appear to be constructive, and has been reverted or removed. Thank you! Oddbodz (talk) 23:18, 2 December 2011 (UTC)

June 2012
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Stuxnet, please cite a reliable source for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. ''

Specifically, where you altered '''"The United Kingdom has denied involvement in the virus's creation." to read "confirmed involvement"  220'  of  Borg 00:19, 2 June 2012 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

August 2016
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Letiche has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 12:41, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Letiche was changed by 65.5.79.137 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.899648 on 2016-08-11T12:41:21+00:00.

Recent edit to Letiche
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Letiche, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Coretheapple (talk) 14:46, 11 August 2016 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Corn dog. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:20, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Corn dog was changed by 65.5.79.137 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.856833 on 2016-08-11T18:20:15+00:00.

August 2016
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been undone. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. DMacks (talk) 18:23, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

July 2021
Your recent editing history at Franklin Foil shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Graham 87 14:34, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Please see my edit summary. If something is historic it will have a detailed Wikipedia article; this session has none at all. Graham 87 14:34, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
 * JohnFromPinckney has also removed this info for similar reasons to me. You appear to be the only person who thinks it's important enough to mention in Wikipedia or anywhere, I'm afraid. If you continue to add it, you may be blocked. Graham 87 03:59, 22 July 2021 (UTC)