User talk:65.51.122.131

August 2009
Welcome and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead. Thank you. I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a message on my talk page. @ 19:15, 19 August 2009 (UTC)

Georgetown University
I'm not sure what the problem is with the summary of Georgetown University. Saying there are some significant faculty or programs really isn't controversial, and most colleges can say as much. Just let me know why you don't like that phrase before deleting it, perhaps on the article's talk page.-- Patrick {o Ѻ ∞} 21:59, 23 October 2009 (UTC)


 * I see you've continued to delete any reference to faculty in the summary. This is an article about an university, and as such, it is important to note the areas in which there are notable faculty. The simple fact that a faculty member has a Wikipedia article means they must meet a minimum requirement for notability in their field, so I don't see how this is in any way a controversial or POV statement. If you really have an issue with it, by all means bring it up on our talk page, but I will continue to revert specious deletions.-- Patrick {o Ѻ ∞} 23:15, 30 October 2009 (UTC)


 * This is the fourth time you have removed the reference to faculty. I've made my point here and now on Georgetown University's talk page, where I would direct you to now. If you could provide an alternative solution to how to word the sentence, I would be very open to suggestions, but simply deleting faculty from the introduction I find unacceptable for reasons stated. So please, either respond to me or on the talk page and we can resolve what issues you have with this.-- Patrick {o Ѻ ∞} 19:39, 23 November 2009 (UTC)

March 2010
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Georgetown University Law Center. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. —Ute in DC (talk) 22:50, 2 March 2010 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Please do not alter the text of cited direct quotations; sneaky vandalism is a bad idea. -- Rbellin|Talk 21:39, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

for. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text  below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. DMacks (talk) 19:40, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

June 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to George Washington University, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. SQGibbon (talk) 22:44, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

George Washington Colonials football
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Strikehold (talk) 21:53, 21 June 2010 (UTC)

2 July 2010
This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. The next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Strikehold (talk) 19:27, 2 July 2010 (UTC)

August 2010
This is the only warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to George Washington Colonials football, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. DMacks (talk) 23:39, 16 August 2010 (UTC)

October 2010
This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits.

The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. DMacks (talk) 16:42, 12 October 2010 (UTC)

Tom Penders
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Tom Penders, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. --AW (talk) 22:28, 27 April 2011 (UTC)

September 2011
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. DMacks (talk) 20:48, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at George Washington University, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. DMacks (talk) 16:48, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2011
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. DMacks (talk) 19:50, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2012
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. DMacks (talk) 18:46, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

June 2012
This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at George Washington Colonials football, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. DMacks (talk) 04:12, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2014
This is your last warning. The next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at George Washington University, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. DMacks (talk) 18:43, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Reference Errors on 20 May
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/RBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/RBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=ReferenceBot%20–%20&section=new report it to my operator]. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:28, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
 * On the Franklin Lakes Nature Preserve page, [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=609411889 your edit] caused a cite error (help) and a missing references list (help | help with group references) . ([ Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:ReferenceBot/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F609411889%7CFranklin Lakes Nature Preserve%5D%5D Ask for help])

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 year for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. DMacks (talk) 02:43, 25 June 2014 (UTC)

February 2017
Your addition to Apshawa Preserve has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 14:14, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

August 2018
Hello, I'm CASSIOPEIA. I noticed that you recently removed content from George Washington University without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page.  Please do not removing source content / sources in the body text.  CASSIOPEIA(talk) 14:59, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.


 * Please do not removing source content / sources in the body text. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 15:00, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

September 2018
Hello, I'm Dan Koehl. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to George Washington University— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Dan Koehl (talk) 00:34, 16 September 2018 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at George Washington University. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. CLCStudent (talk) 20:29, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.