User talk:65.83.119.254

April 2008
Hi, the recent edit you made to Order of the Eastern Star has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks.  MBisanz  talk 02:09, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

June 2008
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to List of O-Parts Hunter characters. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Oxymoron83 18:11, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

Quit Vandalising Dumbass


If your life is a blank page, why do you want Wikipedia to be the same? 59.95.101.133 (talk) 18:42, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

October 2008
Please stop your disruptive editing. If your vandalism continues, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Krawi talk 18:43, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Crime and Punishment has been reverted, as it appears to have removed content from the page without explanation. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. D ARTH P ANDA talk 14:53, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to Crime and Punishment constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to remove content. Thank you. D ARTH P ANDA talk 14:53, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Crime and Punishment. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. D ARTH P ANDA talk 14:54, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Crime and Punishment. D ARTH P ANDA talk 14:54, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

November 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Chromatography has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. sinneed (talk) 00:25, 16 November 2008 (UTC)

December 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Cultivation theory has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. \ / (⁂) 06:49, 5 December 2008 (UTC)

September 2011
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Pretty Ricky with this edit, did not appear to be constructive, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Trusilver 15:01, 22 September 2011 (UTC)

November 2011
Hello and welcome! I edit Wikipedia too, under the username Excirial. Wikipedia is written by people like you and me, so thank you for taking the time to participate. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made to Obscenity with this edit, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions about editing, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Excirial ( Contact me, Contribs ) 19:19, 28 November 2011 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Edward B. Bunn S.J. Intercultural Center with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Excirial ( Contact me, Contribs ) 19:24, 28 November 2011 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Claflin University with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. ItsZippy (talk • contributions) 19:35, 28 November 2011 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Outer space, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.

January 2012
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Outer space, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. JimVC3 (talk) 01:09, 18 January 2012 (UTC)

February 20112
This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Marian Anderson, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Voceditenore (talk) 10:25, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

December 2012
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made an edit to a biography of a living person, Raila Odinga, but that you didn’t support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 11:37, 2 December 2012 (UTC)

June 2013
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edit to History of robots constitutes vandalism and has been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Donner60 (talk) 01:17, 26 June 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Dominic Bett concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Dominic Bett, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 17:40, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

October 2013
Hello, I'm Fraggle81. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Human genome because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Fraggle81 (talk) 02:19, 4 October 2013 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Dominic Bett


Hello 65.83.119.254. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Dominic Bett".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the  or  code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code:, paste it in the edit box at this link , click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 19:01, 24 December 2013 (UTC)

Edit summary
Hi there. When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labeled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:

The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field. If you are adding a section, please do not just keep the previous section's header in the Edit summary field – please fill in your new section's name instead. Thank you. 220  of  Borg 12:46, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

April 2014
Hello, I'm Katieh5584. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Causes of the French Revolution because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Katieh5584 (talk) 16:49, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Authority control, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Andy Dingley (talk) 23:17, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for reverting your recent experiment. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead, as someone could see your test before you revert it. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 23:35, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

November 2015
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Radiometric dating because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Materialscientist (talk) 22:23, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2016
Hello. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Epidemiology of suicide has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Dcirovic (talk) 05:20, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2019
Hello, I'm I dream of horses. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Ovary— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding to your message (talk to me) (My edits) @  20:59, 26 January 2019 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. CLCStudent (talk) 21:00, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Draft:Issac Mccork concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Issac Mccork, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:41, 22 March 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Issac Mccork


Hello, 65.83.119.254. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Issac Mccork".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! - Rich T&#124;C&#124;E-Mail 14:06, 22 April 2020 (UTC)