User talk:65.92.181.18

August 2019
Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to U.S. Route 101— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Serols (talk) 18:34, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.


 * You are getting reported to WP:AIV for block evasion. CLCStudent (talk) 18:37, 7 August 2019 (UTC) that’s false


 * Unfortunately for you, I have probable cause to believe you are user:Gvgfhfgivsf. CLCStudent (talk) 18:39, 7 August 2019 (UTC) no I’m not!


 * There is enough probable cause that I have to report it. CLCStudent (talk) 18:41, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Why were you trying to delete the sockpuppetry tage on User:Gvgfhfgivsf's userpage? CLCStudent (talk) 18:42, 7 August 2019 (UTC)

No65.92.181.18 (talk) 18:43, 7 August 2019 (UTC)


 * The question still stands Why were you trying to delete the sockpuppetry tage on User:Gvgfhfgivsf's userpage? CLCStudent (talk) 18:44, 7 August 2019 (UTC)

I wasn’t65.92.181.18 (talk) 18:46, 7 August 2019 (UTC)

So this [] was not you? CLCStudent (talk) 18:47, 7 August 2019 (UTC)

I was me but I was just being silly65.92.181.18 (talk) 18:48, 7 August 2019 (UTC)


 * Ok, so that means you lied to me when I asked you "Why were you trying to delete the sockpuppetry tage on User:Gvgfhfgivsf's userpage?". Why didn't you tell me the truth the first time? CLCStudent (talk) 18:49, 7 August 2019 (UTC)

I plead the fifth65.92.181.18 (talk)


 * Ma'am, you said in your own words, "I wasn’t" in response to my question. CLCStudent (talk) 18:51, 7 August 2019 (UTC)


 * Now that you lied about one thing, you no longer have any credibility. CLCStudent (talk) 18:52, 7 August 2019 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Honolulu. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Serols (talk) 18:42, 7 August 2019 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to 2014 Pacific typhoon season. Serols (talk) 19:01, 7 August 2019 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Alexf(talk) 19:13, 7 August 2019 (UTC)

Talk page access revoked, block extended. --Yamla (talk) 19:22, 7 August 2019 (UTC)