User talk:66.154.176.51

March 2019
Hello, I'm D Eaketts. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Silver Bridge have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. D Eaketts (talk) 18:28, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2019
Hello, I'm Wtmitchell. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Cretaceous— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 19:17, 25 April 2019 (UTC)

May 2019
Hello, I'm CLCStudent. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Astrodon have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. CLCStudent (talk) 18:25, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Arctic Apples. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Shellwood (talk) 22:30, 7 May 2019 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Arctic Apples, you may be blocked from editing. Shellwood (talk) 22:32, 7 May 2019 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Arctic Apples. Shellwood (talk) 22:42, 7 May 2019 (UTC)

September 2019
Hello, I'm Steve Quinn. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Physics of roller coasters have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Steve Quinn (talk) 20:04, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2019
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Andrew. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. William Avery (talk) 17:12, 24 October 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2019
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Glow stick has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:38, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Glow stick was changed by 66.154.176.51 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.960764 on 2019-10-29T17:38:53+00:00

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Zinc telluride. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Materialscientist (talk) 14:14, 31 October 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2021
Hello, I'm DB1729. Your recent edit(s) to the page 1964 Summer Olympics appear to have added incorrect information, so they have been reverted for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. DB1729 (talk) 21:40, 1 October 2021 (UTC)

March 2022
Hello, I'm EthanGaming7640. An edit that you recently made to Starfish regeneration seemed to be a test and has been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Ethan Gaming  7640  23:14, 7 March 2022 (UTC)

April 2022
Hello, I'm Victor Trevor. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Crow people—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Victor Trevor ( talk ) 20:21, 19 April 2022 (UTC)

May 2022
Hello, I'm Blaze Wolf. I noticed that in this edit to Antimatter, you removed all the content from the page. Please do not do this. Blank pages are harmful to Wikipedia because they have a tendency to confuse readers. As a rule, if you discover a duplicate article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If a page has been vandalised, please revert it to the last legitimate version. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please edit the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the deletion policy for how to proceed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you wish to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 19:58, 17 May 2022 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Structural support, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. SkyWarrior 19:58, 17 May 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Structural support, you may be blocked from editing. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 19:59, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Structural support. -Alabama- (talk) 20:00, 17 May 2022 (UTC)