User talk:66.218.112.1

October 2015
Your recent editing history at Democratic Party presidential debates, 2016 shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Stabila711 (talk) 20:27, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. Stabila711 (talk) 20:38, 17 October 2015 (UTC)

August 2016
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to ZTE has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:04, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: ZTE was changed by 66.218.112.1 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.858039 on 2016-08-08T14:04:33+00:00.

April 2018
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Etymology of California, you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 23:56, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Bizarre Foods with Andrew Zimmern. Binksternet (talk) 23:57, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

July 2018
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Hurricane Daniel (2006) has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:28, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Hurricane Daniel (2006) was changed by 66.218.112.1 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.858898 on 2018-07-16T17:28:24+00:00.

September 2018
Hello, I'm CLCStudent. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Garnett Silk have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. CLCStudent (talk) 19:27, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

June 2019
Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article, Norelco. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles, nor are such pages a forum. Thank you. SemiHypercube 19:43, 9 June 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.