User talk:66.222.105.31

August 2020
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Carnival Cruise Line has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:22, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Carnival Cruise Line was changed by 66.222.105.31 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.879541 on 2020-08-05T17:21:56+00:00

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:The templetons movie


Please do not create hoaxes on Wikipedia, as you did at Draft:The templetons movie. Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 22:25, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

September 2021
Hello, I'm DanCherek. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Curious George (film), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. DanCherek (talk) 23:15, 24 September 2021 (UTC)


 * My son, who is classically autistic, tends to edit Wikipedia articles. I try not to let him, but we have other children and he really enjoys reading Wikipedia articles, so I don't want to block the site. This is primarily why I donate money to Wikipedia every month. I'm sorry for the headaches he causes. 66.222.105.31 (talk) 01:25, 8 January 2023 (UTC)

October 2021
Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Megamind. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:24, 3 October 2021 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Battle of France. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 01:44, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Snowpiercer. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. H is for Hayleez (My H-List)  16:07, 31 October 2021 (UTC)

January 2022
Hello, I'm DuncanHill. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Allies of World War I have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. DuncanHill (talk) 21:47, 14 January 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Battle of Midway, you may be blocked from editing. Loafiewa (talk) 18:42, 15 January 2022 (UTC)

February 2022
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Sinking of the Titanic, you may be blocked from editing. DrKay (talk) 08:15, 4 February 2022 (UTC)

March 2022
For your continued slow burn edit war and continual reinsertion of irrelevant information into the Sinking of the Titanic article and continued similar edits and disruption on other articles. Canterbury Tail talk 19:19, 2 March 2022 (UTC)  You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:.

Please read Wp:OVERLINK and stop adding links to common English terms and country names. Canterbury Tail talk 20:23, 10 March 2022 (UTC)

 You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. You have been blocked again for blatant addition of nonsense and other disruptive edits. Canterbury Tail <i style="color: Blue;">talk</i> 16:47, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

March 2023
Hello! I'm Jean-de-Nivelle. Your recent edit(s) to the page 1955 Le Mans disaster appear to have added incorrect information, so they have been reverted for now. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Jean-de-Nivelle (talk) 23:45, 17 March 2023 (UTC)

April 2024
This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at 1955 Le Mans disaster, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Mojoworker (talk) 00:25, 1 April 2024 (UTC)