User talk:66.254.239.163

January 2019
Hello, I'm Oshwah. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Officer training— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   03:15, 25 January 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not use styles that are unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Officer training. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Thank you. Donner60 (talk) 03:30, 25 January 2019 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use disruptive, inappropriate or hard-to-read formatting, as you did at Officer training, you may be blocked from editing. There is a Wikipedia Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Rosalina2427 (talk to me) 03:37, 25 January 2019 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy, as you did with this edit to Kris Jordan. Donner60 (talk) 03:45, 25 January 2019 (UTC)

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Ad Orientem (talk) 04:00, 25 January 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Unblock discussion
Wait. You knew they were disruptive and made them anyway? You did not know but know now? What assurance do we have that you will edit constructively? Please describe the manner in which those edits were disruptive and what you will do instead. -- Dloh cier ekim  (talk) 04:27, 25 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Nope. This edit alone is enough for a WP:ZT block. I'm not seeing anything constructive in your contrib log, -Ad Orientem (talk) 04:36, 25 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Eeeewwww! I revdel'd that. Are there more? I'll check. TBH, I'd have blocked for much longer than 31 hours. Love to here the explanation for that bit of negative BLP.-- Dloh cier ekim  (talk) 04:51, 25 January 2019 (UTC)
 * See below, Mike

I went to the last page edited by the one mod who warned me and reverted their edit, lol. I have nothing against that politician. 66.254.239.163 (talk) 05:16, 25 January 2019 (UTC) Do you guys see this section anymore? I feel like you wouldn't get "pinged" or whatever by just me editing it. Oh well, wait out the ban, etc etc. 66.254.239.163 (talk) 05:19, 25 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Just some friendly advice. Given your editing history and the above conversation, once your block expires any further disruptive editing will get you reblocked w/o further warning. And the next block, if one is needed, will be a long one. -Ad Orientem (talk) 17:05, 25 January 2019 (UTC)