User talk:66.44.110.10

Welcome to Wikipedia!
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might like to see:


 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * Simplified Manual of Style
 * Intuitive guide to Wikipedia

You are welcome to continue editing without logging in, but you may want to consider  [ creating an account] . Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits such as the ability to create articles. For a full outline and explanation of the benefits that come with creating an account, please see this page. If you edit without a username, your IP address (66.44.110.10) is used to identify you instead.

In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place  before the question on this page. Again, welcome! BracketBot (talk) 14:23, 4 July 2014 (UTC)

July 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=615575990 your edit] to Edward VIII abdication crisis may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 ""s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:23, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
 * some courtesy title (a morganatic marriage) requiring new laws, and a constitutional change; or

January 2015
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=641902211 your edit] to Road to Perdition may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:47, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
 * couple much of the stolen money. Sullivan confronts Rooney with the information while they attend [Catholic Mass|Mass].  Sullivan is seeking to save his life, and that of his son, by bringing to

July 2015
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=669715006 your edit] to Judgment at Nuremberg may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 ""s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 01:34, 3 July 2015 (UTC)
 * at trial, in the record before the Tribunal, evidence of the broad application of “Eugenics Law” laws against incest, laws (at that time) that permitted, or required, the sterilization of

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at The Hustler (film). Your edits have been reverted or removed. Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. '' Stop expanding plot sections beyond the 700-word limit set by WP:FILMPLOT. '' Binksternet (talk) 02:49, 4 July 2015 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to All the President's Men. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 03:00, 4 July 2015 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Sweet Bird of Youth. Binksternet (talk) 03:03, 4 July 2015 (UTC)


 * I'm going to step in here in defense of this user. I've looked at the edits to Sweet Bird of Youth, All the President's Men, The Hustler (film), and Great Locomotive Chase; and in each case they are well-written and constructive. They are also unsourced, but as I noted in my edit summary when reinstating this user's edits at Great Locomotive Chase, many other edits in these articles also provide unsourced information.  I think these are good faith edits, made by a user who may not be familiar with our policies on providing references and/or Original Research.  By providing this user with help and guidance, rather than warnings and threats, we may gain a useful member here.  Let's slow down, and give this user the chance to read and respond to our concerns before threatening to block his/her editing rights.
 * User, if you have questions or concerns, please feel free to ask, for instance by leaving me a message at my talk page, or by visiting the links given in the "Welcome of Wikipedia! at the top of this page. --Badger151 (talk) 17:24, 11 July 2015 (UTC)
 * I am more inclined to think that this person is providing his own analysis which is previously unpublished, for instance at the following diffs which span years:. The question of whether the analysis is good or not is academic; the rules are that you cannot publish your own analysis on Wikipedia. I would recommend this person publish the analysis in a reliable source such as a journal or magazine, then after publication provide a link to it on the appropriate talk page.
 * This person has also violated the film project guideline of plot sections being limited to 700 words.
 * Here are the IPs that I have discovered being used by this person:
 * My impression of what we are dealing with is a person who likes to pontificate but not to cite sources. This has been going on for more than four years, so I am not as apt to cut him some slack. Binksternet (talk) 21:11, 11 July 2015 (UTC)
 * When you say that you have discovered that this person also uses these other IPs, what do you base that on? Further, if indeed this is as you propose, then it's really a job for an administrator, not us.  And, the policy is not to provide additional warnings, and in particular not to provide an escalation of warnings, unless the user has had a chance to read and understand the previous warnings. In your admirable haste to uphold policy, you appear to have (unintentionally, I am sure) overlooked and violated some policies yourself.  (Incidentally, I'm well aware of the need for citations and the need to keep plot summaries brief, though thank you for the reminder). --Badger151 (talk) 03:10, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
 * My impression of what we are dealing with is a person who likes to pontificate but not to cite sources. This has been going on for more than four years, so I am not as apt to cut him some slack. Binksternet (talk) 21:11, 11 July 2015 (UTC)
 * When you say that you have discovered that this person also uses these other IPs, what do you base that on? Further, if indeed this is as you propose, then it's really a job for an administrator, not us.  And, the policy is not to provide additional warnings, and in particular not to provide an escalation of warnings, unless the user has had a chance to read and understand the previous warnings. In your admirable haste to uphold policy, you appear to have (unintentionally, I am sure) overlooked and violated some policies yourself.  (Incidentally, I'm well aware of the need for citations and the need to keep plot summaries brief, though thank you for the reminder). --Badger151 (talk) 03:10, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
 * My impression of what we are dealing with is a person who likes to pontificate but not to cite sources. This has been going on for more than four years, so I am not as apt to cut him some slack. Binksternet (talk) 21:11, 11 July 2015 (UTC)
 * When you say that you have discovered that this person also uses these other IPs, what do you base that on? Further, if indeed this is as you propose, then it's really a job for an administrator, not us.  And, the policy is not to provide additional warnings, and in particular not to provide an escalation of warnings, unless the user has had a chance to read and understand the previous warnings. In your admirable haste to uphold policy, you appear to have (unintentionally, I am sure) overlooked and violated some policies yourself.  (Incidentally, I'm well aware of the need for citations and the need to keep plot summaries brief, though thank you for the reminder). --Badger151 (talk) 03:10, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
 * My impression of what we are dealing with is a person who likes to pontificate but not to cite sources. This has been going on for more than four years, so I am not as apt to cut him some slack. Binksternet (talk) 21:11, 11 July 2015 (UTC)
 * When you say that you have discovered that this person also uses these other IPs, what do you base that on? Further, if indeed this is as you propose, then it's really a job for an administrator, not us.  And, the policy is not to provide additional warnings, and in particular not to provide an escalation of warnings, unless the user has had a chance to read and understand the previous warnings. In your admirable haste to uphold policy, you appear to have (unintentionally, I am sure) overlooked and violated some policies yourself.  (Incidentally, I'm well aware of the need for citations and the need to keep plot summaries brief, though thank you for the reminder). --Badger151 (talk) 03:10, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
 * My impression of what we are dealing with is a person who likes to pontificate but not to cite sources. This has been going on for more than four years, so I am not as apt to cut him some slack. Binksternet (talk) 21:11, 11 July 2015 (UTC)
 * When you say that you have discovered that this person also uses these other IPs, what do you base that on? Further, if indeed this is as you propose, then it's really a job for an administrator, not us.  And, the policy is not to provide additional warnings, and in particular not to provide an escalation of warnings, unless the user has had a chance to read and understand the previous warnings. In your admirable haste to uphold policy, you appear to have (unintentionally, I am sure) overlooked and violated some policies yourself.  (Incidentally, I'm well aware of the need for citations and the need to keep plot summaries brief, though thank you for the reminder). --Badger151 (talk) 03:10, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
 * My impression of what we are dealing with is a person who likes to pontificate but not to cite sources. This has been going on for more than four years, so I am not as apt to cut him some slack. Binksternet (talk) 21:11, 11 July 2015 (UTC)
 * When you say that you have discovered that this person also uses these other IPs, what do you base that on? Further, if indeed this is as you propose, then it's really a job for an administrator, not us.  And, the policy is not to provide additional warnings, and in particular not to provide an escalation of warnings, unless the user has had a chance to read and understand the previous warnings. In your admirable haste to uphold policy, you appear to have (unintentionally, I am sure) overlooked and violated some policies yourself.  (Incidentally, I'm well aware of the need for citations and the need to keep plot summaries brief, though thank you for the reminder). --Badger151 (talk) 03:10, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
 * When you say that you have discovered that this person also uses these other IPs, what do you base that on? Further, if indeed this is as you propose, then it's really a job for an administrator, not us.  And, the policy is not to provide additional warnings, and in particular not to provide an escalation of warnings, unless the user has had a chance to read and understand the previous warnings. In your admirable haste to uphold policy, you appear to have (unintentionally, I am sure) overlooked and violated some policies yourself.  (Incidentally, I'm well aware of the need for citations and the need to keep plot summaries brief, though thank you for the reminder). --Badger151 (talk) 03:10, 12 July 2015 (UTC)

February 2016
Hello, I'm Donner60. I noticed that you made a change to an article, James–Younger Gang, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Donner60 (talk) 03:38, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2016
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Battle of the River Plate, you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 00:57, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

Do not use multiple IP addresses to vandalize Wikipedia, like you did at Populus sect. Aigeiros. Such attempts to avoid detection or circumvent the blocking policy will not succeed. You are welcome to contribute constructively to Wikipedia but your recent edits have been reverted or removed. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Binksternet (talk) 00:59, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Richmond, Fredericksburg and Potomac Railroad, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Shearonink (talk) 07:52, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Crédit Mobilier of America scandal, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Shearonink (talk) 07:53, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Siege of Yorktown. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. For future editing please keep in mind the Wikipedia policies of Wikipedia is not an essay and Verifiability. Shearonink (talk) 08:00, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2016
Hello, I'm Oshwah. An edit you recently made to The Way We Were seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   00:23, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

May 2016
Hello. I wanted to let you know that your recent edit(s) to the On the Waterfront plot summary have been removed because they added a significant amount of unneeded detail. Please avoid excessive detail and high word counts when editing plot summaries/synopses. You may read the plot summary edit guides to learn more about contributing constructively to plot summaries/synopses. There are also specific guidelines for films, musicals, television episodes, anime/manga, novels and non-fiction books. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. -- DonIago (talk) 16:06, 5 May 2016 (UTC)

December 2016
What are you trying to say here? It doesn't seem to scan or make sense. Herostratus (talk) 18:29, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

July 2018
Hello, I'm XYZtSpace. I noticed that you made one or more changes to an article, Kenneth Nichols, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. XYZt (talk) 17:27, 4 July 2018 (UTC)

January 2019
Hello, I'm Hyperius1255. An edit that you recently made seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! —Preceding undated comment added 23:22, 20 January 2019 (UTC)

April 2020
Hello, I'm CLCStudent. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Bertram Ramsay have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. CLCStudent (talk) 22:43, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.