User talk:66.44.114.72

September 2022
Hello, I'm Blaze Wolf. I noticed that in this edit to Chi Alpha, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 19:48, 13 September 2022 (UTC)

December 2022
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Personal Ordinariate of the Chair of Saint Peter‎. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Elizium23 (talk) 05:29, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.


 * Please stop using 7-year-old archived citations to bolster your opinions about what the current practice and terminology is. There are ample, current citations in the articles to contradict you. Elizium23 (talk) 05:30, 31 December 2022 (UTC)


 * Again, you are using WRONG information. This article is about the “ Personal Ordinariate of the Chair of Saint Peter” in the United States and Canada NOT the “Personal Ordinariate of Our Lady of Walsingham” in the United Kingdom which are two separate ecclesiastical jurisdictions with separate rules and purposes but share a similar tradition. The sources you used apply only to the UK Ordinariate (ex-Anglican) and NOT the USA/Canada Ordinariate (ex-Anglican and ex-Methodist) Catholics.
 * www.ordinariate.net? really? Elizium23 (talk) 05:41, 31 December 2022 (UTC)

January 2023
Hello, I'm Lightoil. I noticed that in this edit to Political science, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Lightoil (talk) 05:51, 18 January 2023 (UTC)

March 2023
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that in this edit to Secretary, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 00:51, 1 March 2023 (UTC)

May 2023
Please do not use styles that are nonstandard, unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Praxis (process). There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Wikipedia does not use boldface for emphasis. Belbury (talk) 08:05, 25 May 2023 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. ElKevbo (talk) 16:23, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for block evasion. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page:. Gyrofrog (talk) 20:08, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Please start...
...explaining your edits. Drmies (talk) 00:01, 15 July 2023 (UTC)

July 2023
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. MrOllie (talk) 15:49, 19 July 2023 (UTC)

You really like overlinking, don't you. Don't drown in that sea of blue. Drmies (talk) 21:50, 14 March 2024 (UTC)