User talk:66.46.111.130

April 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Paul Coffey has been reverted, as it introduced negative or controversial biographical material without providing a reliable source for this information. Wikipedia requires that all such material be sourced to address the issue of libel. Thank you.  Mr Stalker  ( talk ) 17:29, 23 April 2010 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Paul Coffey. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -- Boing!   said Zebedee  17:41, 23 April 2010 (UTC)

May 2010
Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Freshfighter9talk 00:48, 9 May 2010 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia or otherwise make unnecessary edits, you will be blocked from editing. Freshfighter9talk 00:52, 9 May 2010 (UTC)

Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits did not appear to contain notable or relevant material and has thus been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make. If attempting to add material of which relevance may be disputed, you may want to first discuss those changes on the article's talk page, in order to gain consensus and avoid conflict. Thank you. Freshfighter9talk 20:59, 12 May 2010 (UTC)

June 2010
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. Freshfighter9talk 23:24, 8 June 2010 (UTC)