User talk:66.85.12.143

Recent edits to Wyandot people
Hello, and thank you for your recent contributions. I appreciate the effort you made for our project, but unfortunately I had to undo your edits because I believe the article was better before you made that change. Feel free to contact me directly if you have any questions. Thank you! Dcirovic (talk) 13:28, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

March 2016
Hello. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Wyandot people has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. JAG UAR   13:24, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Angelfish. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:03, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Angelfish was changed by 66.85.12.143 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.859725 on 2016-03-31T18:03:41+00:00.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Angelfish, you may be blocked from editing. Neil916 (Talk) 18:30, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

September 2016
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Janis Joplin. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Brianga (talk) 15:07, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Endangered species, you may be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Endangered species was changed by 66.85.12.143 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.907116 on 2016-09-26T18:57:24+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:57, 26 September 2016 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Endangered species. Linguist 111 If you reply here, please type    before your message. 19:00, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2018
Hello, I'm Shellwood. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to 2011 Joplin tornado— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Shellwood (talk) 19:02, 20 September 2018 (UTC)