User talk:66.87.120.245

October 2016
Hello, I'm TheFarix. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Powerpuff Girls Z have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. —Farix (t &#124; c) 22:53, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2017
Hello, I'm SummerPhDv2.0. I noticed that you made a change to an article, GloZell, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Please note that the verifiability policy mandates that unsourced material that has been challenged, such as by a "fact" tag, or by its removal, may not be added back without a reliable, published source being cited for the content, using an inline citation. The cited source must clearly support the material as presented in the article, and the burden is on the person wishing to keep in the disputed material. So if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so, following these requirements! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Sum mer PhD v2.0 14:01, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2017
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 05:48, 14 May 2017 (UTC)

August 2017
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Tom (North Shoreman) (talk) 17:16, 2 August 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

splc
This edits looks like POV pushing and vandalism. This sort of thing can get you a block, maybe next time suggest this kind of major alteration of tone on the articles talk page first to avoid giving the wrong impression.Slatersteven (talk) 17:17, 2 August 2017 (UTC)

I note you have reinserted it, if you do so again I will report you, please do not force me to do this.Slatersteven (talk) 17:19, 2 August 2017 (UTC)

August 2017
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:.
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in. — Maile (talk) 12:51, 3 August 2017 (UTC)