User talk:66.87.9.195

September 2017
Hello, I'm Qzd. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Volkswagen Polo— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Qzd (talk) 17:57, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at John Doe. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Pkbwcgs (talk) 17:59, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Volkswagen New Beetle, you may be blocked from editing. Serols (talk) 17:59, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Volkswagen New Beetle. Pkbwcgs (talk) 18:02, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. – Gilliam (talk) 18:02, 20 September 2017 (UTC)