User talk:67.107.166.135

December 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Greco-Roman world, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Cubathy (talk) 11:17, 4 December 2009 (UTC)

January 2010
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Megalodon. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. neko-chan :3 (talk) 21:14, 14 January 2010 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Talk:Lady Gaga has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Clarince63 (talk) 20:34, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Talk:Beyoncé Knowles. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Tyw7 (Talk • Contributions)   Changing the world one edit at a time! 20:38, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

February 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Lord of the Flies has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. M aen K. A. Talk  15:34, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Prince Fielder has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. The Thing //  Talk  //  Contribs  15:39, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

Subinfeudation
Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to a loss of editing privileges. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Your edit can be seen here. &mdash; MrDolomite &bull; Talk 17:09, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

Primogeniture
Welcome to Wikipedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing; we invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism and are immediately reverted. Please stop; If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. here. &mdash; MrDolomite &bull; Talk 17:07, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Periodic trends, you will be blocked from editing. Cptmurdok (talk) 17:08, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

April 2010
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Printing press. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Immunize (talk) 13:23, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Debt-for-Nature Swap. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to a loss of editing privileges. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Your edit can be seen here. &mdash; MrDolomite &bull; Talk 13:30, 20 April 2010 (UTC)


 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Jenaveve Jolie. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Samwb123T (R)-C-E 16:11, 28 April 2010 (UTC)

May 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Lenny Kravitz has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Favonian (talk) 15:17, 14 May 2010 (UTC)

July 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Henry Clay has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Ncmvocalist (talk) 15:05, 19 July 2010 (UTC)

October 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. While everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your contributions, such as your recent edit to Scopes Trial, did not appear to be constructive and was automatically reverted by DASHBot.
 * Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * DASHBot produces few false positives, but they do happen. If you believe the bot has reverted your edit wrongly, it is helpful if you report the error so the bot does not make the same mistake again. Please:
 * Click here to submit a false positive report.
 * [ Edit this page] and remove this message.

Thanks, DASHBot Anti-Vandalism (talk) 13:28, 18 October 2010 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Your test on the page Roman law worked, and has been removed. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing and its related help page for more information. Thank you. Ajraddatz (Talk) 13:33, 22 October 2010 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Roman law. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Special Cases Spit out your comments 13:34, 22 October 2010 (UTC)

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 year for abuse of editing privileges. If you have a registered Wikipedia username, you may log in and continue to edit. Otherwise, once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. —EncMstr (talk) 16:58, 22 October 2010 (UTC)

December 2011
Hello, and welcome! Although everyone is welcome to contribute, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Template:Largest cities of Greece with this edit, did not appear to be constructive, and has been reverted or removed. Thank you! Arnavchaudhary (talk) 14:25, 6 December 2011 (UTC)

February 2012
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Pacifism, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Ramaksoud2000 (Did I make a mistake?) 02:27, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Roaring Twenties, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=477044255 here]. Glacialfox (talk) 18:23, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

September 2013
Hello, I'm Jamesx12345. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Soledad, California, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jamesx12345 15:54, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

October 2013
Hello, I'm RandomLittleHelper. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to King Dunlap, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Random Little Helpertalk 16:31, 14 October 2013 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Hurricane Irene. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Denisarona (talk) 17:58, 21 October 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Master of Puppets. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to The Mighty Macs because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! m.o.p 16:30, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Four Noble Truths, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. ToBeFree (talk) 17:23, 25 October 2013 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2014
This is the only warning you will receive. Your recent vandalism, as you did to Yoda, will not be tolerated. Although vandalizing articles on occasions that are days or weeks apart from each other sometimes prevents editors from being blocked, your continued vandalism constitutes a long term pattern of abuse. The next time you vandalize a page, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia without further notice.  Dwpaul  Talk   15:49, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2014
Hello, I'm Discospinster. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Water politics, because it was not constructive. If you have any questions, you can leave a message on my talk page. Thanks. ... disco spinster   talk  16:38, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Water politics with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Katieh5584 (talk) 15:57, 20 March 2014 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Water politics with this edit, you may be blocked from editing.   Wikipelli Talk   15:54, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Water politics.   Wikipelli Talk   15:58, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

April 2016
Hello. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Apple sauce has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Dcirovic (talk) 16:34, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Apple sauce with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. D6h! ?'' 16:45, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

April 2019
Hello, I'm Deauthorized. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Jabba the Hutt— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Sincerely, Deauthorized. (talk) 15:11, 8 April 2019 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Taj. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Serols (talk) 16:54, 8 April 2019 (UTC)

April 2022
Hello, I'm Suonii180. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person   on Sam Bankman-Fried, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Suonii180 (talk) 19:16, 12 April 2022 (UTC)

January 2023
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Hershey–Chase experiment. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Dirkbb (talk) 21:19, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

March 2023
Hello, I'm Hey man im josh. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Calibration curve seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Hey man im josh (talk) 18:12, 22 March 2023 (UTC)

May 2023
Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Joseph Wilbur. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to being blocked from editing. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 17:29, 10 May 2023 (UTC)