User talk:67.135.94.2

July 2020
Hello, I'm Bmf 051. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Eric Adams (politician) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Bmf 051 (talk) 12:18, 19 July 2020 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Eric Adams (politician), you may be blocked from editing. Bmf 051 (talk) 15:30, 19 July 2020 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Eric Adams (politician). Bmf 051 (talk) 15:37, 19 July 2020 (UTC)

Hello. This is a message to let you know that you have made an edit summary that did not appear to be appropriate, civil or otherwise constructive, and it may have been removed. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Accusing other editors of racism is not constructive. Bmf 051 (talk) 15:49, 19 July 2020 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Eric Adams (politician). Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you. Ifnord (talk) 15:50, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This individual erroneously inserted “disbarred” into the intro of the bio page of public figure Jeannie Rhee, with of course no citation (as it is not true). 2600:1003:B12E:57DD:49E7:F4EC:8E73:409F (talk) 18:34, 26 September 2020 (UTC)

March 2021
Hello. This is a message to let you know that you have made an edit summary that did not appear to be appropriate, civil or otherwise constructive, which has been removed. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, please discuss proposed changes on the Talk page *prior* to initiating an Edit War, for you may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. Furthermore, also note that accusing other editors of racism is neither respectful nor constructive. Thank you. -hh (talk) 17:19, 22 March 2021 (UTC)