User talk:67.141.141.116

Why revert? Woods is a self proclaimed activist, his online political rhetoric, funding and endorsement of multiple political campaigns/groups. Dont let your biases and opposition towards his political beliefs cloud your judgement. Woods is just as much of an activist as Rose McGowan is

I provided a link but it was blacklisted
 * If a link was blacklisted, it is most likely an unreliable source. Please try to find a better source, especially when modifing the biographies of living persons. Chlod (say hi!) 00:16, 2 March 2020 (UTC)

Its a no brainer James Woods is an activist. I mean you clearly have to have something against the guy if you say otherwise. As far as a link being unreliable... Moving the goalpost fallacy. A terrible argument... Especially for you to make such proclamation without even seeing the link. Ill just chalk this up to personal bias for these revert until you prove otherwise. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.141.9.241 (talk) 18:05, 2 March 2020 (UTC)

March 2020
Hello, I'm Chlod. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, James Woods, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Chlod (say hi!) 00:15, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.