User talk:67.165.17.94

August 2017
Hello, I'm Telfordbuck. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to People's Khural of Kalmykia have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Telfordbuck (talk) 23:07, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You have a message :)
—  Yulia Romero  • Talk to me!  21:25, 15 August 2017 (UTC)

August 2017 (continued)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at 2017 North Korea crisis. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Hornetzilla78 (talk) 23:06, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to National Assembly (Angola), you may be blocked from editing. Shellwood (talk) 15:55, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

August 2017
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at 15th legislature of the French Fifth Republic. Mélencron (talk) 22:47, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

September 2017
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at German federal election, 2017, you may be blocked from editing. Mélencron (talk) 16:37, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for block evasion. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:.  Schwede 66  06:02, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Justice Party (South Korea). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. --Garam (talk) 12:41, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Alliance 90/The Greens. Samf4u (talk) 18:19, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. gadfium 18:20, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

Bundestag seats
Please don't update the number of seats parties have until the constitution of the Bundestag – yes, the election has occurred, but keep in mind that in most cases there is a certain period between elections and when elected representatives take their seats. In this case the next Bundestag will not convene later, next month. Mélencron (talk) 18:21, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Can you please confirm that you do read the messages on your talk page? Mélencron (talk) 19:16, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
 * See the Bundestag site – Petry is considered factionless. Early days, yet. Mélencron (talk) 03:42, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

Pilz list color
I literally chose that hex color arbitrarily myself when the Pilz list was added to the Austrian polling article. It's not a color that's used by the Pilz list, which should be white. It's not even a customary color used by the Pilz list, either, so stop trying to reinstate it. (I was the one who initially chose that light green, but it's not correct to use it, which is why I changed it to white, since the light green is not used by the party itself.) Mélencron (talk) 16:21, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Please stop restoring the light green. I've already explained – I'm the user who originally chose the light green for use on Wikipedia, but the fact is that it's not actually used by the party, nor a customary color used by media to represent it (in polls and such), so stop restoring it. Gray/white is the most common color used to represent the party, and is the one used by the list itself for representation, as well as being the one officially submitted by the party list for the 2017 election. Mélencron (talk) 17:00, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Again, I'm literally the person who chose that color that you keep trying to restore, and I can tell you that it's not the correct color. Mélencron (talk) 17:10, 15 October 2017 (UTC)

October 2017
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:.  Schwede 66  17:30, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Bundestag. I don't know if you ever read your talk page, but given that I've reverted you and your accounts probably a good 200 times, I'd suggest that you do'' take notice of why myself and other editors have reverted your edits instead of merely ignoring these notices or remaining uncommunicative. In this case, you've been repeatedly attempting to update seat numbers for the Bundestag with those from the 2017 election before the new Bundestag is even seated (which will be the case on 24 October), and in some cases oblivious to the fact that these numbers aren't necessarily the same and therefore incorrect (two have stated that they would not be part of the AfD faction in the Bundestag, so the correct number for them would be 2). Perhaps it'd be useful to take notice to other editors' reasons when they revert you, especially given that you seem to merely ignore them and get repeatedly reverted for the exact same reasons. You're wasting both your and our time.'' Mélencron (talk) 19:47, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.